False Artifacts Have Value....Just Ask Mr. Black

Provenance: Do We Really Need To Know From Where Artifacts Come From?      

Did you know that supposedly “faked” and “hoaxed” artifacts can provide us with true and correct information about the ancient past? Consider our story and decide for yourself:

A short while ago we began a communication with a well known author about the unusual artifacts released by the Mexican Government in 2012 and their significance for understanding the great antiquity of intelligent life on Earth.
He was very kind and courteous in his response and we were excited to receive his email. Hey! It isn’t everyday that we have contact with the famous. Well, even so, something he mentioned seized our attention for quite awhile. It actually disturbed us. We didn’t know why but it did.
This famous author had told us to make certain of the provenance of the artifacts in questioned. He wanted us to be certain of the artifacts’ history of ownership and their true origin and discovery. Of course his guidance was correct. Even so, we believed it was unnecessary because we approached our study of the implications and interpretations of the artifacts from a unique perspective.
Here is what we mean. Even if the artifacts were “fakes” the science that they portray could be examined and tested. You see, scientific truth can not be faked or hoaxed. Artifacts could be copied and recopied but the science they contain is either true or false and one could test the veracity of the science even without the knowledge of the “provenance” of the artifact.
Let us consider a few examples. The Ica Stones are good artifacts to use to understand what we mean. These engraved stones were discovered in the mid-twentieth century by Dr. Javier Cabrera, MD. These stones have images of what appear to be dinosaurs and humans and is some of the evidence cited for the coexistence of these beings.
Well, close examination of these stones demonstrate that the “humans” are not humans. Their features are too different to be modern people even though they have a similar appearance. Their noses and ears are too long; their foreheads slant at too great an angle and they have no thumbs. Humans must have thumbs. So, these stones do not prove the coexistence of humans and dinosaurs.
What about the dinosaurs? That is another matter. For one thing, these stones depict dinosaurs as our modern science understands them. However, they did show characteristics that our science only discovered toward the latter part of the 20th century and early 21st century.
The brontosaurus was shown with a longer head instead of the short head. The flying dinosaur is shown with crescent shaped wings something not known with certainty until 2013. Lastly, the dinosaurs appear small. In fact, they didn’t achieve their large size until about 86 million years ago. Before then they were about the size of humans.
So, these stones depict scientific truth that could not be faked even though the stones were accused of being fakes. In short, the Ica Stones demonstrate the true nature of the world more than 86 million years ago.
Now, let us consider the Mexican artifacts. These artifacts were claimed to have been kept secret for 80 years. The claim is that they were found in 1932 and made public in 2012. As to why they were kept secret we do not know. There have also been claims of fraud with these artifacts. In any event, we can still study and learn from these artifacts.
Specifically, what exactly do they show and how can we interpret them? Well, they show individuals with elongated cone shaped heads. They also show human sacrifice through the cutting out of an individual’s heart and a cone headed individual giving birth to a cone headed new born. The mother, in this case, has breasts like humans today.
In addition to these images the artifacts also show what appears to be space flight. These cone headed beings are shown traveling in a spacecraft to what looks like the planet Saturn. The spacecraft are also shown traveling to and from a circle or orbit. Finally, they show an arm reaching from a large triangle shaped land mass encompassing almost the entire area of a planet and touching another world with one finger from a hand with no thumb. This other planet has an atmosphere and no moon.
So, where does provenance fit in here? Actually, it doesn’t. If we were in the artifact business, either buying or selling artifacts, or just displaying them in a museum, or even studying them to learn about their manufacture, then, provenance would be a very important consideration.
However, we are not doing any of these things. We are only considering the artifacts to learn what they can tell us about the past. Even if the artifacts are fakes, they still teach us a great about the past that is true. Science needs not be afraid to study them.
So, what do these Mexican artifacts teach us about the past? A great deal and the results are most amazing. For example, these artifacts teaches us that Earth was inhabited by cone head individuals who were very different from ourselves while having much in common with us.
An important thing that they teach us is that our ancient ancestors were not monkeys or apes. In fact, their differences were such that our paleontologists may not be able to identify their fossils. That is because scientists identify primate and mammalian fossils by examining their eye orbits, their jaws, and their heads (skulls). Well, these cone heads have a very different anatomy. Their anatomy is different enough to make proper identification unlikely.
What else can we learn? Well, we learn from the image of Earth that the images show us a time very remote in our past. We know this because the Earth is shown with an ice field around it, the moon has a massive debris field, and the space flight is headed for Saturn and Jupiter is not shown. This indicates a very different solar system not just a very different Earth.
Ok! Don’t we have to verify the science before we accept these things as true? Yes we do. The cone heads are displayed in a number places to include both Egypt and Easter Island. In fact, there were Flathead Indians from the American Northwest that had cone heads but eyes and anatomy like modern humans. So, cone headedness is not an analogy some kind of abstract art. It is a real characteristic associated with humans and our ancestors.
What about the solar system and the earth? Well, science has theorized about the Earth having an ice ring for a long time. Furthermore, the debris field by the moon is a direct outcome of the current theory of lunar formation. That is that the Earth was impacted by a Mars sized object that created the moon together with a debris field.
The most important part of the image, the part that allows us to both verify and approximately date the image, is the image of the outstretched arm coming from a large triangle or spear point shaped massive land area taking up nearly the full circle of the planet. This image corresponds to the scientifically re-constructed map of the ancient super continent of Rodinia. Rodinia has been dated to between 1.1 billion to 750 million years ago.
The science is true and these artifacts show us a time so far in Earth’s past as to be unbelievable. Furthermore, these artifacts teach us that these ancients had spaceflight. The artifacts depict spacesuits, travel into and out of orbit, and travel to other planets. Spacesuits and orbital transfer are necessary for space flight so this part of the science is also true.
Saturn seems to be the oddity here. Why show an image of Saturn and no image of Jupiter? This does not seem to be logical. However, there have been scientific studies that have suggested a solar system where Jupiter and Saturn exchanged their orbits just like Neptune and Uranus have.
So, then, the science of Saturn’s image is also true. This teaches us that at the time of Rodinia the solar system was a different place and the Earth was a different world. It was very much an alien world. This alien Earth was destroyed when Saturn and Jupiter changed their orbits causing massive solar system destruction. This destruction has cover-up our ancient past.
We have discovered all of this even though we do not know the provenance of the Mexican artifacts. Since the science these artifacts depict is true, we can accept them as showing us a true image of the ancient past that is more amazing than could have been conceived by the mind of modern man.

A Fresh Look At The Great Egyptian Sphynx

One of the greatest archaeological anomalies on Earth is the Egyptian Sphinx. No one really knows who made it or when it was made. This is in spite of the claims of academic scholars. One reason for this is the dispute about its age between Geologists and Egyptologists. Egyptology claims an age of 4500 years old. Geology views things differently.
We will discuss the published research of two scientists from the Ukraine. They are Vjacheslav I. Manichev and Alexander G. Parkhomenko. At the time their article was published, they were associated with the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Their paper dates the Sphinx at over 800,000 years old. Let us take a look.
The current historical-archaeological methods used to date the Sphinx by Egyptologists can not be accepted by geology. That is because the Sphinx displays signs of water erosion that can not be explained by the current accepted age 4500 to 5000 years old.
You can not have water erosion of the Sphinx unless it was built at a time when abundant water existed in Egypt. A date of 4500 to 5000 years is too recent a time for Egypt to have had abundant water because it was still a desert. Furthermore, a date of 13000 BC, a time of high humidity and pouring rains in Egypt, is still too recent a date to explain the water erosion found on the Sphinx.
So, how do we date the water erosion? Well, Manichev and Parkhomenko have compared the erosion of the Sphinx with erosion along sea coasts and have discovered a similarity. In fact, geologists who specialize in sea coast geomorphology know this type of erosion as wave-cut hollows. They can be either one story or multi-storied erosion patterns. Wave-cut hollows are found horizontal to surface water and can cause cliffs as found on the Black Sea.
Examination of the Great Egyptian Sphinx demonstrates that this pattern of erosion is found from the head to foot on this structure. This indicates that the Sphinx was at one time submerged. The total height equals 160 meters and lasted for considerable time. The various cut-hollows correspond to varying water levels over time.
But what could have caused the submergence of the Sphinx? The answer seems to be increased water level of the Mediterranean which flooded the Nile Valley. This flooding of the Nile caused long-living water-bodies with a time estimate of 800,000 years. But the Sphinx had to have been built BEFORE this flooding. Therefore, it is possible for the Sphinx to be much older.
With the support of geological research my belief of an extreme old age for ancient Egyptian civilization, 28 million years, becomes a real possibility and not mere conjecture. In any event, the origin and development of civilization on earth must be re-examined and current beliefs changed.
Reference
Vjacheslav I. Manichev and Alexander G. Parkhomenko. 2008. “Geological Aspect Of The Problem Of Dating The Great Egyptian Sphinx Construction” in Geoarchaeology and Archaeomineralogy, Eds. R.I. Kostov, B. Gaydarska, M. Gurova, Sofia.

The Mystery Behind The Guadeloupe Skeleton

The Guadeloupe Woman: Is it a 15th century or 28 Million Year Old Skeleton?

In 1810 the British seized the French Island of Guadeloupe and sent a large stone slab back to England containing a skeleton of a headless and footless woman.  This particular skeleton has become the object of controversy regarding the age of the skeleton and the Creation debate.  We will discuss this skeleton and add to this debate.
We came across this oddity when reading the website Bad Archaelogy.wordpress.com written by Keith Fitzpatrick Matthews, an English archaeologist.  Frankly, his precision and attention to specific detail regarding the skeleton was refreshing even though it demonstrated a traditional and narrow perspective.  We understand that science must be rigorous. We also understand that it is necessary for science to disprove various theories in order to get to an accurate and truthful assessment of any object, artefact, or skeleton.  However, narrowness and rigid adherence to traditional methodologies do not guarantee correctness.  Since science, itself, is an exercise in probabilistic truth; it can’t guarantee certainty.

So, what do we have?  Well, we have a skeleton found in a slab of rock one mile long with an unknown date of origin.  Matthews states that the original investigator declared the stone to be a kind of sandstone made up of a concretion of calcareous sand.  Well, so far so good. Additionally, Matthews tells us that there is a grave yard near the site of the skeleton’s excavation began at the time of Columbus’ discovery of the island in the Caribbean in 1493. Therefore, he believes this skeleton is not of Miocene age, 28 million to 5 million years old, but of a recent date, possibly in the 15^th century.
Now, this skeleton may indeed be a 15^th century skeleton.  However, it is not proven to be so.  It still could be of a much older age even of 28 million years old.  This skeleton’s age may not be “discredited” at all because of the probabilistic nature of science and the fact that a modern age has not been proven either.  To properly determine its age one would have to examine the geology of the matrix surrounding the skeleton, examine the skeleton, itself, and properly study the geology of the island of Guadeloupe.  To the best my knowledge, none of these things have been done.  So, there is a real lack of evidence on the side of traditional “mainline” archaeology to support a claim of a recent, 15^th century, age for this skeleton.
Now, can we find any other evidence to support a claim of an older age?  Yes!  First, the skeleton was imbedded in rock.  This is a process that takes some time.  Second, we can consider a new technique, one that I have pioneered, that is the use of plate tectonics – the movement of the continental plates.
If we do this we arrive at an unexpected surprise.  Guadeloupe, as with all the islands of the West Indies rest on the Caribbean plate and neither on the North America nor South American plates.  This means if we extend the location of Guadeloupe backward in time we find that at the end of the Cretaceous Period, 66 million years ago, it was located south to southwest of the Yucatan.  With the meteorite impact that killed the dinosaurs, a huge tidal wave of 1100 feet in height flooded all of Mexico and the surrounding area and could have carried bodies of individuals to Guadeloupe.  A closer look at the eastern side of the island shows an indentation that could have been caused by this tidal wave. Of course additional geological research is needed to confirm this.
So, we claim that the skeleton has not been discredited until further research is done.  Furthermore, the fact of the Caribbean plate movements due place Guadeloupe much closer to the Yucatan opens the door to the possibility that the skeleton maybe not 28 million years old but 66 million years old.  The question is still open.

What If Time Was Infinite....Give Or Take A Billion Years

What if time were infinite in both directions, past and future?  Think about this for a minute.  What we have is eternity and that would be necessary for the universe to exist. This challenges the Big Bang Theory of the origin of the universe and puts us at odds with mainline academic science.

The Electric Theory of the universe allows for eternity.  This means that there is really no way to determine the age of the universe.  Now reconsider my research that indicates that intelligent life has existed on our world for upwards of one billion years.  Ask yourself: “What is a billion years compared to eternity?”  The answer would: “Not very much”.  That is the point. A billion years compared to eternity is meaningless. So, a billion year old civilization on earth is not an extreme idea and should not be rejected out of hand.
Some may argue that there is no proof for the Electric Theory of the universe. However, there is really no proof for the Big Bang Theory either.  Although both theories have experimental support, neither can be considered proven, at least not in the sense that mathematical theorems are proven.
Another way to consider this is that the universe is the sum total of all possible outcomes for the given inputs at the specific time of the observation (today, yesterday, tomorrow).  Evolution can be viewed in this way also.  It is not so much that life forms evolve but that as time passes the various conditions (inputs) change so life is forced to change.  Although we view this change as evolution it is actually the result of the process of the constant change in the universe.
Applying this to the Earth, we find our planet existing in a dynamic solar system, one that like the universe changes with time.  As change occurs, the Earth must also change and so too does life.  So, what we have with intelligent life, is what is possible at the “time” of its existence. Even if the solar system is only 5 billion years old and the universe 14 billion years old this would still be the case.
Now, our research has come across the artifacts released by the Mexican Government in 2012 that show cone headed beings and inter-planetary space travel.  Such an artifact provides substantiation for an ancient intelligent society of non-humans existing at the time of Rodinia, i.e. 900-750 million years ago.  This argues that intelligent life on our world is the result of various inputs that made such life possible at that time.  In fact, it indicates that our solar system may have be capable of harboring intelligent life from an extremely early epoch.
Although we do not know how or why this is possible, it seems to be the case.  Furthermore, there seems to be evidence that the solar system underwent significant changes and wide-spread destruction and that life re-established itself.
There is the possibility that archaeology may have discovered proof, or at least evidence for this. Specifically, Teotihuacan may offer this evidence.  Peter Tompkins in his book “Mysteries of the Mexican Pyramids” discusses the theory that the site lay-out of this city may have been modeled after the solar system and the location of various structures indicate the location of the planets in the solar system with an error of 2 per cent. What if this was not an error but actually indicated the relative positions of the planets at the time of the construction of the city.  We have calculated that this city is 70 million years old.  A 2 per cent change in 70 million years may seem insignificant, however, if this change accumulates at a regular rate, we would have a change in planet positions of almost 22 per cent 750 million years ago. This was the time that Rodinia broke apart.  Rogue planets would also be possible.
This presents us with the possibility that the ancients built Teotihuacan as an absolute reference marker for future generations so they would have access to their scientific knowledge to restore civilization in the event it was destroyed.
Mainline science currently knows that life was destroyed on our planet many times in various mass extinctions.  Now, it seems that there is a real possibility that intelligent life was also destroyed and managed to re-established itself.  We are the intelligent beings that have re-established intelligent life after the destructions of these ancients.  We do not know who or what they were or where the originated from, never-the-less, we are here and must study these ancients.

Alien Attack On Mars - Just Ask Mr. Black

Can you believe this? An American PhD (where else?) published an article in the Journal of Cosmology on November 20, 2014 and in it he stated that an alien thermonuclear bomb attack destroyed the ancient civilization on Mars. WOW!
Actually, in his paper, Dr. John Brandenburg does a good job of defending his theory and he believes that this explains the Fermi Paradox of why aliens (ET) are not visiting Earth today.
Dr. Brandenburg uses NASA data of isotope distribution to defend his conclusions. He sees the similarity of the distribution of these isotopes to the result of atomic testing in the atmosphere here on Earth. Furthermore, he identifies two separate blasts, one of which was a planet killer or 10 billion megatons. Without getting into a discussion of isotopes we will make a few comments about his implications of his work.
First, we must state that an explosion of 10 billion megatons seems to us to be too large to be an artificial event. We think that a meteor of loosely packed material that included both uranium and thorium would be a more likely cause of the destruction of Mars. Although the explosion would not be thermonuclear, the large amount of uranium and thorium would poison Mars because it would have been distributed throughout the planet. In any case, the destruction would still be as extensive.
Second, Dr. Brandenburg offers a date of 180 million years ago as the time of the blast. In fact, the doctor states that the explosion could have occurred at an even older date. Well, if we just accept his dating then we have an extreme challenge to modern mainline science because he states that the Mars Civilization bears similarities to both the Egyptians and Mayans on Earth.
Although he does not say that the civilizations on Mars directly influenced or caused the civilizations on Earth, it is very hard not to think that this is the case. Let us face facts. Given that both the Earth and Mars had civilizations of similar cultural characteristics it would seem obvious that the one on Mars which dates to 180 million years ago would have at least influenced the Earth civilizations. This tends to push the age of Earth’s Egyptian and Mayan Civilizations to 180 million years ago if not even older. This is a strong challenge to modern mainline science. Maybe we are descended from ET.
In one of our posts on this blog we discussed the possibility that Mars may have been destroyed 250 million years ago. See our post “Was Mars Destroyed 250 Million Years Ago” posted in June 16, 2014. Well, it seems from a brief examination of Dr. Brandenburg’s article that we were more right than wrong.
We want to thank Dr. John Brandenburg for his research and article and welcome his future work.

Happy Holidays From Mr. Black

We wish to extend holiday greetings to all of our readers during this holiday season. Best Wishes to all of you and thank you for visiting our blog.

We also wish to ask you to email us with your questions and comments. We enjoy communicating with our readers.  Email us at: black2tell@yahoo.com.
By the way, our 100 page, limited edition book, Secrets of Lost Earth is still available. Contact us if you are interested in this book.
We also do public presentations on our research and if you know of a group that would like to sponsor one of our talks please contact us.
Again, please accept our greetings for this holiday season. Mr. Black

Mr. Black Asks: How Old Are The Ica Stones Of Peru?

Could the Ica Stones be 86 Million Years Old?      

Well, here we are again dating something back many millions of years. As we read back over our blog posts we have the same feeling of unbelief at the very dates we have demonstrated. Oh yes, they have been demonstrated and they keep getting older and older.

Why are they so very old? They are so very old because new scientific discoveries have provided researchers with new tools to study the past. One of the most important of these tools is plate tectonics, the study of the movement of the Earth’s continental plates. Oh, for those of you who don’t know the continents do move. This is scientific fact.
Well, in addition to plate tectonics, paleontologists who study dinosaurs have recently discovered that dinosaurs only gained their great size in the last 20 million years of their existence, between 86 million to 66 million years ago. Before that time, dinosaurs were about the size of human beings today. (Scientific American May 2015) Now, with this new information we can re-examine the Ica Stones again.
Before we do this let us review what the Ica Stones are. They are engraved stones found near the town of Ica in Peru. These stones were originally discovered by a medical doctor Javier Caberra and kept in a small private museum in Ica. These engraved stones have images of dinosaurs, strange animal life, and what look like humans beings – doctor Caberra called them “proto-humans”.
So, how do we get such an old date for the Ica Stones? Well, when you examine the Ica Stones closely, you notice that they appear to depict small dinosaurs. In fact, even the images of the “proto-humans” shown illustrate these beings as smaller than we are now. For all this to be an accurate depiction of reality it would have to show images from a time at least 86 million years ago.
Now, let us not get excited. Although the images may indeed represent scenes that are that old, the Ica Stones, themselves, could have been copied and recopied. It is the images that represent creatures that are at least 86 million years old.