tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-45439537586278983202024-03-13T19:39:16.166-07:00Meet Mr. BlackWho is Mr. Black? An anonymous writer that has keen information that we are not alone.....Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.comBlogger26125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-20708124918084429112017-01-07T17:51:00.000-08:002017-01-07T17:51:11.485-08:00The "Tracks of Time"<h2 class="entry-title" style="text-align: center;">
<a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/2017/01/02/tracks-of-time-could-tracks-in-turkey-be-14-million-years-old/" rel="bookmark"><span style="color: black;">Tracks of Time: Could Tracks in Turkey be 14 Million Years Old?</span></a> </h2>
<!-- .entry-meta --> <br />
<div class="entry-content">
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGrfnHSaylFGC4EPRNx4lm34bLaygi2RxyWrBktNaZz2ACTiVGPIEcc-6PTv-tQa8mdj-8WZ0nRVbbmFzJumnGD6K78oPOZeGxDrE5uvXQEmNJoLNMezRPkWgm32QDrEErEXG5RGH2GNCF/s1600/maxresdefault.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="226" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjGrfnHSaylFGC4EPRNx4lm34bLaygi2RxyWrBktNaZz2ACTiVGPIEcc-6PTv-tQa8mdj-8WZ0nRVbbmFzJumnGD6K78oPOZeGxDrE5uvXQEmNJoLNMezRPkWgm32QDrEErEXG5RGH2GNCF/s320/maxresdefault.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<div id="yiv4523601524yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1483380918331_51396">
Did you know that there are mysterious tracks called “cart tracks” all over Southern Europe. From Turkey, to Italy, to Malta, to Spain, these tracks are embedded into the rock hard surface land features, some even going up and down at a nearly vertical angle.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div id="yiv4523601524yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1483380918331_51392">
</div>
<div id="yiv4523601524yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1483380918331_51393">
What are these tracks and how were they made? One researcher believes that they were made by self-powered vehicles, the size of automobiles traveling on the wet soggy ground of Southern Europe 14 million years ago. If he is right, this means that intelligent life existed on planet Earth an extremely long time ago and that they were not human.</div>
<div>
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv4523601524yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1483380918331_51395">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv4523601524yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1483380918331_51395">
Russian Geologist Dr. Alexander Koltypin of Moscow’s International Independent University of Ecology and Politology has dated the cart tracks of the Phrygia Valley of Turkey to between 12 to 14 million years old. He claims that the tracks are preserved in petrified volcanic ash that was wet soft when the the tracks were made. He believes the tracks were made by heavy off road vehicles because tracks are parallel and are about the with of a car or truck and the sides of the tracks have scratches made by axels.</div>
<div dir="ltr">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv4523601524yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1483380918331_51395">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv4523601524yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1483380918331_51395">
On the island of Malta, in San Gwann, a suburban town of 14,000 people near Slienna and St. Julian, similar ruts (tracks) were also discovered that are assumed to be pre – Punic Bronze Age (2300 – 1000 BC) that look like the rock was sliced. They are considered strange because there are only two pair of ruts bisected by hollowed out lines. The area also exhibits few green flower pedals that also adds to the strangeness.</div>
<div dir="ltr">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv4523601524yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1483380918331_51395">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv4523601524yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1483380918331_51395">
In Tlaxcala, Mexico there are parallel groves with a depth of 40 cm of lengths of 90 cm to 9 meters that run East to West. These groves are also unexplained.</div>
<div dir="ltr">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv4523601524yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1483380918331_51395">
</div>
<div dir="ltr" id="yiv4523601524yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1483380918331_51395">
All of these ruts, groves, and tracks are too perfect to be of natural origin and add additional evidence for the existence unknown ancient civilizations around the world.</div>
</div>
<!-- .entry-content --> <br />
<div class="entry-utility">
<span class="cat-links"><span class="entry-utility-prep entry-utility-prep-cat-links">Posted in</span> <a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/category/ancient-civilization/" rel="category tag">ancient civilization</a>, <a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/category/artifacts-2/" rel="category tag">ARTIFACTS</a>, <a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/category/geological-dating/" rel="category tag">geological dating</a>, <a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/category/lost-cities-of-mexico-2/" rel="category tag">Lost Cities of Mexico</a>, <a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/category/scientific-theories/" rel="category tag">scientific theories</a> </span> <span class="meta-sep">|</span> <span class="comments-link"><a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/2017/01/02/tracks-of-time-could-tracks-in-turkey-be-14-million-years-old/#respond">Leave a comment</a></span> </div>
<!-- .entry-utility --> <!-- #post-## --> <br />
<div class="post-334 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-alien-civilization-on-marsmars category-ancient-civilization category-ancient-egypt category-uncategorized tag-africa tag-civilization tag-egypt tag-mars" id="post-334">
<h2 class="entry-title">
<a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/2016/10/12/is-the-giza-plateau-in-egypt-either-140000-or-28-5-million-years-old/" rel="bookmark">Is the Giza Plateau in Egypt either 140,000 or 28.5 Million years old?</a></h2>
<div class="entry-meta">
<span class="meta-prep meta-prep-author">Posted on</span> <a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/2016/10/12/is-the-giza-plateau-in-egypt-either-140000-or-28-5-million-years-old/" rel="bookmark" title="7:08 pm"><span class="entry-date">October 12, 2016</span></a> <span class="by-author"><span class="sep">by</span> <span class="author vcard"><a class="url fn n" href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/author/black2tell/" rel="author" title="View all posts by black2tell">black2tell</a></span> </span> </div>
<!-- .entry-meta --> <div class="entry-content">
<br />
Are you familiar with the work of Sherif El Morsi and Antoine Gigal published in Epoch Times on March 6, 2015?<br />
They discovered a petrified exoskeleton of an echinoid (sea urchin) at the Giza plateau. This indicated that the whole site was at one time underwater, upwards of 245 feet underwater. The dating is still not known but it would require a date older than currently accepted, maybe 140,000 years. So, it seems that the whole Giza complex including the Sphinx are still very odd archaeological finds and due to their being underwater are very much older than believed.<br />
Now, why did I write about this? The answer should be obvious. Currently accepted dating dealing with the Giza site, including the pyramids, is very much in doubt. You see, since the discovered echinoid was at the ground level of the pyramid, the pyramid had to have been constructed close to the time of the flooding of the Giza plateau. If not, then deposits would have placed the echinoid at a much higher height than the pyramid base indicating a younger date. This is not the case. These pyramids at the Giza plateau have to be very old indeed. Some have even suggested that the pyramids were built upwards of 28.5 million years ago because this is the date that the base ground level was deposited (formed). Ancient Egypt has to be much older than currently accepted by scholars.<br />
My work seems to point to a date closer to 28.5 million years ago even though we have dated neither the Giza plateau nor the pyramids. However, if anyone closely examines the Egyptian art work, they will notice differences between the beings displayed on some of the art and modern humans. These differences, not discussed here, seem to point to the fact that the ancients were a different but related species to modern humans. Exactly what connection there is between modern humans and the ancients still has to be determined. Keep in mind that, to the best of our knowledge, there are no fossils of human like beings that are 28.5 million years old.<br />
Furthermore, the research of Dr. John Brandenburg indicates the destruction of an ancient civilization on the planet Mars as-well-as similarities between ancient Egypt and Mars civilizations. All of this is still very controversial but highly suggestive of inter planetary travel between Earth and Mars in the very distant past.<b></b><i></i><u></u><sub></sub><sup></sup><strike></strike></div>
</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-49887519259669395462016-11-13T17:56:00.001-08:002016-11-13T17:56:15.065-08:00Mr. Black Explains The Science Behind......Mr. Black<h2 class="entry-title" style="border-image: none;">
Is Mr. Black A Scientific Heretic? <div style="border-image: none;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
A few days ago, I spoke with an old friend who told me that she had looked over my blog and didn’t “follow it”. She couldn’t understand what I was getting at and how I discovered the great antiquity of intelligent life on the Earth. Well, I decided to write this little essay to help others who may have the same difficulty.</div>
</h2>
<div class="entry-content">
<div style="border-image: none;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQbe4PYMhyphenhyphenGsXC1mlSuU-NcfGmReUq_-T1atqfTWimeDZ1w4Vqtw5LK7tEICTJWkptk8beNe-ON02OB4jabzn32_6DjLolorG5zktJlAB5as-rDgESnuNhChoqRiY-_tFfADukfn5AWgrw/s1600/unnamed.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="203" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgQbe4PYMhyphenhyphenGsXC1mlSuU-NcfGmReUq_-T1atqfTWimeDZ1w4Vqtw5LK7tEICTJWkptk8beNe-ON02OB4jabzn32_6DjLolorG5zktJlAB5as-rDgESnuNhChoqRiY-_tFfADukfn5AWgrw/s320/unnamed.jpg" width="320" /></a>One of the basic “truths” that I have discovered is that one cannot hoax true science. I know that so-called scholars will argue with me here but what I have said is true. One cannot hoax true science. What does this mean? It means that when one comes across an unusual artifact with unknown history of ownership or discovery that the artifact can still be tested by examining the science depicted on the artifact. Even if the artifact has been copied and re-copied, the science can be examined. Well, examining the science depicted on various artifacts gives us a very different understanding of our planet’s past and the true history of civilization. Both intelligent life and civilization are far older than anyone could have even imagined, upwards of one billion years old.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
Furthermore, the recent scientific discoveries of the last 50 years neither exclude nor render impossible this claim. They do the exact opposite and both allow and support the reality of this claim. In short, intelligent-life, both human and non-human, has existed for a very long time on planet Earth.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
Just how did we go about making this discovery? We began by looking for impact craters on earth and plotting them on a map. We also applied mathematics. We divided the map of the globe into sectors and averaged the location of the impact craters to discover an “average” or “mean” position for the impacts. This allowed us to plot a line around the world that represented an orbital path of a celestial object around our planet. We, at first, believed that this object was a lost moon of earth – and it still could be – but a better explanation is that it represented the debris field of an impact of earth by a Mars sized object over 4.1 billion years ago. In fact, the orbital path matches the impact trajectory and orbital direction of our moon. This conforms to the “Big Splat Theory” of lunar formation.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh65x8ZWRSHN__kN5Ww-N59WsUfcUxxBfFxOZ30rl0iSfi1SlNCaORi13sZoADT6tpDfn7YXCrZzB5ZwhJdIA6geYT5FpCS8EPCkaYUHVdmd5fv7bQWTrxQpgc0NAbLZMOOOiQ7RMr6zSq6/s1600/_66927571_157281215.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="181" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh65x8ZWRSHN__kN5Ww-N59WsUfcUxxBfFxOZ30rl0iSfi1SlNCaORi13sZoADT6tpDfn7YXCrZzB5ZwhJdIA6geYT5FpCS8EPCkaYUHVdmd5fv7bQWTrxQpgc0NAbLZMOOOiQ7RMr6zSq6/s320/_66927571_157281215.jpg" width="320" /></a>Given this orbital path, we applied Plate Tectonics, the movement of the continents, by using this path as a reference line and were able to date various archaeological sites. This resulted in the finding of extremely old dates for civilization. We got a date of 28.5 million years for ancient Egypt and upwards of 103 million years for an ancient civilization in Mexico. The current dating of Mexico’s lost cities represents the date that these sites were occupied by modern humans and not their original builders.</div>
Given the old dates we calculated, we were able to make sense out of the images engraved on various artifacts. These artifacts showed us images of intelligent beings that were “human like” but not “human” as we are. One specific characteristic of the ancients was that they did not have thumbs. This meant that they were not anthropoids (apes) and therefore could not be human. All of this is clearly displayed on various artifacts but is not openly discussed in archaeological circles.<br />
This result also explains the possibility of extra-planetary civilizations, particularly on Mars. It seems that the ancients were capable of interplanetary space flight at the time of their destruction by some ancient calamity. Dr. John Brandenburg has written that he has discovered evidence of a nuclear explosion on Mars that destroyed the planet. He bases this on the discovery of Xenon 129, an isotope produce in nuclear explosions. He also dates the destruction of Mars back to 180 million years ago.<br />
However, our work indicates that intelligent life resided on the Earth at the time of the super continent of Rodinia. This super continent became extinct 750 million years ago and brings our work into direct conflict with established paleontology, specifically on the dating of when life spread across the surface of the earth. Paleontology dates the spread of life on the surface of the earth to 542 million years ago but we deem it to be very much earlier, over one billion years, with intelligent life and civilization between 864-825 million years ago. This also seems to be the date that the ancients travel to the planets.<br />
We fully realize that what we are claiming is controversial in the extreme but it is not absurd. These claims are made based upon our examination and study of the data we have been able to consider and they are not excluded by recent finds. However, currently established academic disciplines including archaeology, Egyptology, Mayan studies, paleontology, philology, and paleo-anthropology (human origins) have much to reconsider and correct. This makes us a scientific heretic of the first order.</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-11575192593639535412016-08-08T17:05:00.002-07:002016-08-08T17:05:48.383-07:00Mr Black Explains the Difficulty of Studying the Very Ancient Past....<h2 class="entry-title" style="border-image: none;">
<span style="font-size: small;">Euler, the 18th century mathematician, stated that two variables that are equal to a third variable are equal to each other. He said that this was self-evident. In other words, this is a universal or absolute truth of mathematics. Like philosophy, mathematics deals with absolute truth. However, this is not the case for science. Remember, you cannot go from “bottom-up” but only “top-down” to properly explain nature. In short, a workable theory needs to be developed and supported by observation and experiment to provide us with scientific truth. Scientific truth is neither dogmatic nor absolute. It is only probable and subject to change with new information. Unfortunately, the bias of mainline science will resist any change.</span></h2>
<div class="entry-content">
<div style="border-image: none;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiga4GOC-ae55kiTaHggOormgM7UiDfss0h1kuNt8VmLU0RFSBOcVzLFnbfUCIsoAr_y9kj4hXaw3T77PIbSvKMrkzkBw2xOMNtqnnB-9lVOj-zLHA1ZpO8l7AGfUUqyB9eEU4LBX3t7lVI/s1600/2c3f40027cdeffc25fd94791410153075d3dda16.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiga4GOC-ae55kiTaHggOormgM7UiDfss0h1kuNt8VmLU0RFSBOcVzLFnbfUCIsoAr_y9kj4hXaw3T77PIbSvKMrkzkBw2xOMNtqnnB-9lVOj-zLHA1ZpO8l7AGfUUqyB9eEU4LBX3t7lVI/s1600/2c3f40027cdeffc25fd94791410153075d3dda16.jpg" /></a>Here is another example. Alfred Wagoner developed a theory that continents move and called it “Continental Drift”. Mainli</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
ne science, particularly in the United States highly criticized Wagoner for his work. What happened? In 1968, with the discovery of sea floor spreading, geologists accepted the theory of plate tectonics, the movement of continents.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
Now, let us consider OOP fossils and artifacts. What are OOPs? They are “out of place” artifacts and fossils, inexplicable finds that cannot be explained and were often found by non-professional scientists. This is often the reason they are ignored and dismissed, often as fakes, by mainline science. There are many objects that can be called OOPs but even considering their non-professional discoveries they can still provide data that can help us unravel and explain the past. They should not be dismissed out of hand.</div>
One archaeological artifact that is not considered an OOP is the Egyptian Sphinx. I believe it to be an OOP because Geologists and Egyptologists do not agree on its age, an age disparity upwards of 800,000 years. The great age of intelligent life on earth has been demonstrated by this OOP. Furthermore, this great age also challenges the belief that only modern humans were capable of civilization.<br />
How do we come to this conclusion? So called experts in Egyptology date it as 4500 years old. Dr. Robert Schoch (PhD geology) sees it as being at least 5,000 to 7,000 years old. In a conference in the late 1990s geologists agreed with him while the Egyptology accepted the younger date. Furthermore, additional research conducted by two scientists from the Ukraine discovered that the Sphinx was at one time totally submerged and as the water level dropped left “wave-cut hollows on the Sphinx. This could have only happened at the earliest, 800,000 years ago. (Vjacheslav I. Manichev and Alexander G. Parkhomenko. 2008. “Geological Aspect of the Problem of Dating The Great Egyptian Sphinx Construction” in Geoarchaeology and Archaeomineralogy, Eds. R. I. Kostov, B. Gaydarska, M. Gurova, Sofia.)<br />
Frankly, it seems to me that all traditionalist or mainline researchers just don’t know how to really interpret and understand their research results. All truth is self- evident but that assumes that the researcher is not closed minded or blinded by mainline scientific bias. The refusal of mainline researchers to even study so called OOPs demonstrates their bias. Also, their refusal to even consider the possibility of non-human intelligent life possessing civilization further demonstrate their bias. How can anyone look for non-human intelligence in the Earth’s ancient past if they begin by not even accepting the possibility that they may have existed? You cannot find what you are not looking for.<br />
Here is another discovery I have come across through my research. Mexico was the home of a civilization upwards of 100 million years ago. This civilization came to an end 66 million years ago with the impact that killed the dinosaurs. This can be easily determined by considering the movement of the North American Plate. The easy way is to keep in mind that the ancients worshiped the sun so their temples must face east. Well, the geographical location of the various cities and temples in the Yucatan face east when the North American plate is re-positioned to where it was 66 million years ago. Furthermore, much of the Mexican lost civilization was covered under a massive layer of soil. Since it would take more effort to bury their ancient cities that build them, it is obvious (self-evident) that their burial resulted from the massive tidal wave resulting from the impact that killed the dinosaurs 66 million years ago.<br />
This analysis makes all the lost cities of Mexico OOPs.<br />
Archaeological research in either Egypt or Mexico, or anywhere else for that matter cannot be considered as rigorously scientific because of the built-in bias of their disciplines and refusal to accept geological dating of which Dr. Robert Schoch’s work on the Sphinx is an example. The Sphinx is not irrelevant to the study of any OOP. It is the exception that proves the rule.<br />
Furthermore, some of the methods of archaeological dating are very problematic. One reason is that one cannot date when a stone or rock structure was built. What is generally done is some other item is found and dated with Carbon 14 testing. Carbon 14 cannot date beyond 50,000 years.<br />
<div style="border-image: none;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBau8bVHde1y2xUnP3NnijGe7mb11ZMUkdfsLDm5ld6fecXXe0i3Q_IGnY4vIakhRg0wv-s6PPPzh_MGlQjPOQkhbRUGXd5zMdd0567qsiPwPN0StJRTzDC3rJhbKJj2leGlOcOAGe6vD0/s1600/ancient-history5.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhBau8bVHde1y2xUnP3NnijGe7mb11ZMUkdfsLDm5ld6fecXXe0i3Q_IGnY4vIakhRg0wv-s6PPPzh_MGlQjPOQkhbRUGXd5zMdd0567qsiPwPN0StJRTzDC3rJhbKJj2leGlOcOAGe6vD0/s320/ancient-history5.jpg" width="320" /></a>Now, in the case of Mexico, it is possible to test my conclusions. Just rotate a map of the North American plate backward in time to 66 million years ago and you will find that the temples, cities, and streets of the Maya face east as they should if they were built by a society that worshiped the sun.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
Plate tectonic movement is the only way to study and date very ancient sites. Tectonic movement provides dates that make sense and explains other research. For example, the Maya seem to have similarity with ancient Egypt and other ancient civilizations, possibly predating these other civilizations. Well, my work using plate tectonic movement, dates a civilization in Egypt and the Azores to 28.5 million years and a civilization in Mexico to from 103 to 66 million years. So, yes this ancient civilization in Mexico could have seeded other ancient civilizations.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
Furthermore, if we examine the Mayan cities, we find them all buried. In fact, there are Mayan, and Olmec, and other ruins in Mexico still underground. It doesn’t make sense that the ancients buried these places themselves. However, an impact by the meteor that killed the dinosaurs would explain that because of the tidal wave produced.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
These ancients were not modern people. They were both similar and dissimilar to us but they were not us.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
Let me make a suggestion. Don’t just accept the mainline scientific research. Some of it is good but some of it is not. Remember that academics have many other considerations than pure science. Their careers and funding issues are examples and they tend to color research. Also, many PhD researchers tend to be overly specialized. This also colors their work.</div>
</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-1593779876351081182016-07-05T19:46:00.002-07:002016-07-05T19:46:55.600-07:00Mr. Black explains.... "The Dorchester Pot"<h2 class="entry-title" style="border-image: none;">
If it looks like a dog, and acts like a dog, then it is must not be a dog. Does this make sense? Of course not because it would be illogical to come to this conclusion. Well, this is just how mainline academics, particularly archaeologists, come to their conclusions about a famous mysterious artifact called “the Dorchester Pot”.</h2>
<div class="entry-content">
<div style="border-image: none;">
What is this artifact? It is a metal vase-like object that was discovered in 1852 at the Meeting House in Dorchester near Boston in the United States. The Dorchester Pot was found in two pieces after the explosion and measures 4.5 inches high, 6.5 inches in diameter at its base and 2.5 inches in diameter at the top. The object was reported in both a local paper, the <u>Boston Transcript</u> and in the June 5, 1852 issue of <u>Scientific America</u>.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhVIhaN4fRW5N4vauJiUc5bU6260qp3QYGGxVzZh2xo1KfDFtY6doXYKZ2E8-qdcKiFf9lGvP5yaiB180MHIjqcswyXHdA8ygaza7EZaWPjBH4WaSu3YPiZ2PSFv53Vl5N_4eHhYVTOxSpq/s1600/118658_orig.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="261" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhVIhaN4fRW5N4vauJiUc5bU6260qp3QYGGxVzZh2xo1KfDFtY6doXYKZ2E8-qdcKiFf9lGvP5yaiB180MHIjqcswyXHdA8ygaza7EZaWPjBH4WaSu3YPiZ2PSFv53Vl5N_4eHhYVTOxSpq/s320/118658_orig.png" width="320" /></a>The object was blasted out of pudding stone (Conglomerate) that is part of the Roxbury Conglomerate 15 feet below the surface. The Roxbury is estimated to have formed 593 to 570 million years ago.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
However, archaeologists cannot accept this possibility that this artifact is this old so they reject it “out of hand”. No one wishes to heed the work of unorthodox researchers and face up to the amazing implications of this discovery. That is, that there existed in North America an advanced civilization, one with the ability to work metals.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
Well, what is the “truth” about this object? The archaeologists Keith Fitzpatrick- Matthews and James Doeser on their “Bad Archaeology” website view this object as a Victorian styled candlestick. Italian debunker Biagio Catalano views as nearly identical in decorations and shape to an Asiatic Indian pipe holder in Munbai.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
Michael Cremo, a nonorthodox researcher, believes this artifact to be evidence of ancient metal workers in North America over 600 million years ago.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
So, who is correct? How do we decide? Mainline academics just cannot accept the extreme age of the artifact. Let’s face it. If they do then they have to alter all their theories and re-write their archaeology books.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
Is there a way we can find a solution? Yes! You see that the Mexican Government released photos of artifacts found in Mexico. These photos we made public in 2012 after being kept secret for 80 years. What we notice after looking closely at the artifacts is that they indicate a civilization at the time of the supercontinent of Rodina, between 900 to 750 million years ago.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
This changes everything. It means that a date of 600 million years for the “Dorchester Pot” is possible. It also means that mainline academic understanding of evolution and the origin of people is seriously flawed.</div>
<div style="border-image: none;">
Our research, written elsewhere on this blog supports this extreme date for civilization on Earth and the very real possibility that this “Dorchester Pot” is upwards of 600 million years old.</div>
</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-61862759937377305302016-05-27T05:28:00.001-07:002016-05-27T05:29:02.027-07:00Planets Changing Orbits......Ohhhh Mr.Black <h2 class="entry-title">
<a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/2016/05/11/new-planet-proves-planets-change-orbits/" rel="bookmark">New Planet Proves Planets Change Orbits</a> </h2>
<!-- .entry-meta --> <br />
<div class="entry-content">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjgUtD7WI4-ReB0c51qhGfB68C_vR1rVCusgpEJvNAI5W1KYppNFXQKEl8qfHJaeJLaig539f_3FCD6HQR_JDFEFo-pytIVYQ1i8PvJJY6hZC96z4S1lRxkPAnnfkXOZ6WFg8tGy3sYy09_/s1600/planet-orbiting-wrong-way.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="192" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjgUtD7WI4-ReB0c51qhGfB68C_vR1rVCusgpEJvNAI5W1KYppNFXQKEl8qfHJaeJLaig539f_3FCD6HQR_JDFEFo-pytIVYQ1i8PvJJY6hZC96z4S1lRxkPAnnfkXOZ6WFg8tGy3sYy09_/s320/planet-orbiting-wrong-way.jpg" width="320" /></a>The recent discovery by two Caltech researchers (Yahoo News 1/21/2016) of the possible existence of another planet in our solar system beyond Pluto supports my research. Mike Brown and Konstantin Baytgin computer simulations indicate the very real possibility of another planet 56 million miles away from the sun that completes an orbit every 20,000 years. This planet may have altered the orbits of either Saturn or Jupiter, or for that matter the orbit of any other planet. This supports our research that the solar system was different in the very ancient past and led to the destruction of life on Earth and/or the other planets.<br />
Briefly, their work with mathematical modeling and computer simulations indicate that a planet 10 times the size of Earth would have altered the orbits of the other planets in earlier times of the solar system and could, itself, been knocked out of orbit by the gravitational pull of Jupiter and Saturn. (See their paper “Evidence for a Distant Giant Planet in the Solar System”)<br />
The current theory among solar system scientists is that at its origin the solar system had four planet cores, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune but it could have easily had five cores. The interaction between these planetary bodies would have altered the planets’ orbits and knocked this new one out of orbit and into the Kuiper Belt which is home to a very large number of ice bodies and asteroids.<br />
Why is this important? It is important because from inspection of artifacts released by the Mexican Government in 2012 there is evidence of an ancient Earth civilization that had space flight and memorialized a trip to Saturn. Jupiter was nowhere indicated.<br />
This civilization existed on planet Earth at the time of the supercontinent of Rodinia. Rodinia formed from 1100 to 900 million years ago and was destroyed 750 million years ago. This leads us to conclude that intelligent life may have existed on Earth upwards of one billion years ago. The current discovery of this new planet supports our work and does not contradict it. If we were incorrect then new science would contradict our work and prove us wrong. Since this new science does not contradict us then we must be on the right track and are closer to the truth then even we first believed.<br />
This is the sixth new scientific discovery that allows our research and supports our conclusions. The other include: plate tectonics, the reconstruction of supercontinents, the impact that killed the dinosaurs, the “Big Splat” theory of the formation of the moon, and “Snowball Earth”.<br />
Earth did indeed harbor intelligent life at a very early time, possibly one billion years ago. Our work and the new scientific discoveries we have just mentioned make this abundantly clear.</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-72223065192975143162016-04-24T05:35:00.002-07:002016-04-24T05:35:47.151-07:00False Artifacts Have Value....Just Ask Mr. Black<h2 class="entry-title">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4AbNfTfNYK0iLRcvKKGCDFLCqgYhRfnXkoJauRnuvaWkTsSzxFBq4Nu6ZLwQ2RmjPBO1OIppEe7jf1sxm-BQXTqfDrEaE5jvW6Cjzs5L2Pbx9bpVCzXdFSRI7rMaBZ6-6kneXFKf0Kgrx/s1600/untitled.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj4AbNfTfNYK0iLRcvKKGCDFLCqgYhRfnXkoJauRnuvaWkTsSzxFBq4Nu6ZLwQ2RmjPBO1OIppEe7jf1sxm-BQXTqfDrEaE5jvW6Cjzs5L2Pbx9bpVCzXdFSRI7rMaBZ6-6kneXFKf0Kgrx/s1600/untitled.png" /></a><a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/2015/07/05/provenance-do-we-really-need-to-know-from-where-artifacts-come-from/" rel="bookmark">Provenance: Do We Really Need To Know From Where Artifacts Come From?</a> </h2>
<!-- .entry-meta --> <br />
<div class="entry-content">
Did you know that supposedly “faked” and “hoaxed” artifacts can provide us with true and correct information about the ancient past? Consider our story and decide for yourself:<br />
<br />
A short while ago we began a communication with a well known author about the unusual artifacts released by the Mexican Government in 2012 and their significance for understanding the great antiquity of intelligent life on Earth.<br />
He was very kind and courteous in his response and we were excited to receive his email. Hey! It isn’t everyday that we have contact with the famous. Well, even so, something he mentioned seized our attention for quite awhile. It actually disturbed us. We didn’t know why but it did. <br />
This famous author had told us to make certain of the provenance of the artifacts in questioned. He wanted us to be certain of the artifacts’ history of ownership and their true origin and discovery. Of course his guidance was correct. Even so, we believed it was unnecessary because we approached our study of the implications and interpretations of the artifacts from a unique perspective.<br />
Here is what we mean. Even if the artifacts were “fakes” the science that they portray could be examined and tested. You see, scientific truth can not be faked or hoaxed. Artifacts could be copied and recopied but the science they contain is either true or false and one could test the veracity of the science even without the knowledge of the “provenance” of the artifact.<br />
Let us consider a few examples. The Ica Stones are good artifacts to use to understand what we mean. These engraved stones were discovered in the mid-twentieth century by Dr. Javier Cabrera, MD. These stones have images of what appear to be dinosaurs and humans and is some of the evidence cited for the coexistence of these beings.<br />
Well, close examination of these stones demonstrate that the “humans” are not humans. Their features are too different to be modern people even though they have a similar appearance. Their noses and ears are too long; their foreheads slant at too great an angle and they have no thumbs. Humans must have thumbs. So, these stones do not prove the coexistence of humans and dinosaurs.<br />
What about the dinosaurs? That is another matter. For one thing, these stones depict dinosaurs as our modern science understands them. However, they did show characteristics that our science only discovered toward the latter part of the 20th century and early 21st century. <br />
The brontosaurus was shown with a longer head instead of the short head. The flying dinosaur is shown with crescent shaped wings something not known with certainty until 2013. Lastly, the dinosaurs appear small. In fact, they didn’t achieve their large size until about 86 million years ago. Before then they were about the size of humans.<br />
So, these stones depict scientific truth that could not be faked even though the stones were accused of being fakes. In short, the Ica Stones demonstrate the true nature of the world more than 86 million years ago. <br />
Now, let us consider the Mexican artifacts. These artifacts were claimed to have been kept secret for 80 years. The claim is that they were found in 1932 and made public in 2012. As to why they were kept secret we do not know. There have also been claims of fraud with these artifacts. In any event, we can still study and learn from these artifacts.<br />
Specifically, what exactly do they show and how can we interpret them? Well, they show individuals with elongated cone shaped heads. They also show human sacrifice through the cutting out of an individual’s heart and a cone headed individual giving birth to a cone headed new born. The mother, in this case, has breasts like humans today. <br />
In addition to these images the artifacts also show what appears to be space flight. These cone headed beings are shown traveling in a spacecraft to what looks like the planet Saturn. The spacecraft are also shown traveling to and from a circle or orbit. Finally, they show an arm reaching from a large triangle shaped land mass encompassing almost the entire area of a planet and touching another world with one finger from a hand with no thumb. This other planet has an atmosphere and no moon.<br />
So, where does provenance fit in here? Actually, it doesn’t. If we were in the artifact business, either buying or selling artifacts, or just displaying them in a museum, or even studying them to learn about their manufacture, then, provenance would be a very important consideration. <br />
However, we are not doing any of these things. We are only considering the artifacts to learn what they can tell us about the past. Even if the artifacts are fakes, they still teach us a great about the past that is true. Science needs not be afraid to study them.<br />
So, what do these Mexican artifacts teach us about the past? A great deal and the results are most amazing. For example, these artifacts teaches us that Earth was inhabited by cone head individuals who were very different from ourselves while having much in common with us. <br />
An important thing that they teach us is that our ancient ancestors were not monkeys or apes. In fact, their differences were such that our paleontologists may not be able to identify their fossils. That is because scientists identify primate and mammalian fossils by examining their eye orbits, their jaws, and their heads (skulls). Well, these cone heads have a very different anatomy. Their anatomy is different enough to make proper identification unlikely. <br />
What else can we learn? Well, we learn from the image of Earth that the images show us a time very remote in our past. We know this because the Earth is shown with an ice field around it, the moon has a massive debris field, and the space flight is headed for Saturn and Jupiter is not shown. This indicates a very different solar system not just a very different Earth.<br />
Ok! Don’t we have to verify the science before we accept these things as true? Yes we do. The cone heads are displayed in a number places to include both Egypt and Easter Island. In fact, there were Flathead Indians from the American Northwest that had cone heads but eyes and anatomy like modern humans. So, cone headedness is not an analogy some kind of abstract art. It is a real characteristic associated with humans and our ancestors.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKeUf9PxVFt-v1_nO2K7kUWgCtEMlIcHBC23ucAVxpJgyJaSmGrl4w4HxDN3Mck7SGoeCY2UZcUp8RfduVE0Cr3B8989mNSzRaDnZVXk6WUET8TTeNZu62QIV6rpb8s7Vmjjm82q_oFKJ2/s1600/artifacts_01.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgKeUf9PxVFt-v1_nO2K7kUWgCtEMlIcHBC23ucAVxpJgyJaSmGrl4w4HxDN3Mck7SGoeCY2UZcUp8RfduVE0Cr3B8989mNSzRaDnZVXk6WUET8TTeNZu62QIV6rpb8s7Vmjjm82q_oFKJ2/s320/artifacts_01.jpg" width="320" /></a>What about the solar system and the earth? Well, science has theorized about the Earth having an ice ring for a long time. Furthermore, the debris field by the moon is a direct outcome of the current theory of lunar formation. That is that the Earth was impacted by a Mars sized object that created the moon together with a debris field.<br />
The most important part of the image, the part that allows us to both verify and approximately date the image, is the image of the outstretched arm coming from a large triangle or spear point shaped massive land area taking up nearly the full circle of the planet. This image corresponds to the scientifically re-constructed map of the ancient super continent of Rodinia. Rodinia has been dated to between 1.1 billion to 750 million years ago. <br />
The science is true and these artifacts show us a time so far in Earth’s past as to be unbelievable. Furthermore, these artifacts teach us that these ancients had spaceflight. The artifacts depict spacesuits, travel into and out of orbit, and travel to other planets. Spacesuits and orbital transfer are necessary for space flight so this part of the science is also true. <br />
Saturn seems to be the oddity here. Why show an image of Saturn and no image of Jupiter? This does not seem to be logical. However, there have been scientific studies that have suggested a solar system where Jupiter and Saturn exchanged their orbits just like Neptune and Uranus have. <br />
So, then, the science of Saturn’s image is also true. This teaches us that at the time of Rodinia the solar system was a different place and the Earth was a different world. It was very much an alien world. This alien Earth was destroyed when Saturn and Jupiter changed their orbits causing massive solar system destruction. This destruction has cover-up our ancient past.<br />
We have discovered all of this even though we do not know the provenance of the Mexican artifacts. Since the science these artifacts depict is true, we can accept them as showing us a true image of the ancient past that is more amazing than could have been conceived by the mind of modern man. </div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-34338286679049401332016-02-21T20:56:00.001-08:002016-02-21T20:56:42.632-08:00A Fresh Look At The Great Egyptian Sphynx<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgw6p7D7slzL64mx5PcaUohxY5McCeQspONqolL6KS1WCCULEUEfSBFUeSIKDkx04XHK89va4ExPLDj3kTBMeJLi8vTZ8oPDGrWbjFv1YAnHwIZSAtIRcmehdqM5W2crODHcu3IIs2zGNqP/s1600/images1IM9W1JE.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgw6p7D7slzL64mx5PcaUohxY5McCeQspONqolL6KS1WCCULEUEfSBFUeSIKDkx04XHK89va4ExPLDj3kTBMeJLi8vTZ8oPDGrWbjFv1YAnHwIZSAtIRcmehdqM5W2crODHcu3IIs2zGNqP/s1600/images1IM9W1JE.jpg" /></a></div>
One of the greatest archaeological anomalies on Earth is the Egyptian Sphinx. No one really knows who made it or when it was made. This is in spite of the claims of academic scholars. One reason for this is the dispute about its age between Geologists and Egyptologists. Egyptology claims an age of 4500 years old. Geology views things differently. <br />
We will discuss the published research of two scientists from the Ukraine. They are Vjacheslav I. Manichev and Alexander G. Parkhomenko. At the time their article was published, they were associated with the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Their paper dates the Sphinx at over 800,000 years old. Let us take a look.<br />
The current historical-archaeological methods used to date the Sphinx by Egyptologists can not be accepted by geology. That is because the Sphinx displays signs of water erosion that can not be explained by the current accepted age 4500 to 5000 years old. <br />
You can not have water erosion of the Sphinx unless it was built at a time when abundant water existed in Egypt. A date of 4500 to 5000 years is too recent a time for Egypt to have had abundant water because it was still a desert. Furthermore, a date of 13000 BC, a time of high humidity and pouring rains in Egypt, is still too recent a date to explain the water erosion found on the Sphinx.<br />
So, how do we date the water erosion? Well, Manichev and Parkhomenko have compared the erosion of the Sphinx with erosion along sea coasts and have discovered a similarity. In fact, geologists who specialize in sea coast geomorphology know this type of erosion as wave-cut hollows. They can be either one story or multi-storied erosion patterns. Wave-cut hollows are found horizontal to surface water and can cause cliffs as found on the Black Sea.<br />
Examination of the Great Egyptian Sphinx demonstrates that this pattern of erosion is found from the head to foot on this structure. This indicates that the Sphinx was at one time submerged. The total height equals 160 meters and lasted for considerable time. The various cut-hollows correspond to varying water levels over time.<br />
But what could have caused the submergence of the Sphinx? The answer seems to be increased water level of the Mediterranean which flooded the Nile Valley. This flooding of the Nile caused long-living water-bodies with a time estimate of 800,000 years. But the Sphinx had to have been built BEFORE this flooding. Therefore, it is possible for the Sphinx to be much older. <br />
With the support of geological research my belief of an extreme old age for ancient Egyptian civilization, 28 million years, becomes a real possibility and not mere conjecture. In any event, the origin and development of civilization on earth must be re-examined and current beliefs changed.<br />
Reference<br />
Vjacheslav I. Manichev and Alexander G. Parkhomenko. 2008. “Geological Aspect Of The Problem Of Dating The Great Egyptian Sphinx Construction” in Geoarchaeology and Archaeomineralogy, Eds. R.I. Kostov, B. Gaydarska, M. Gurova, Sofia.Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-87763584866174935982016-02-07T11:37:00.000-08:002016-02-07T11:37:00.959-08:00The Mystery Behind The Guadeloupe Skeleton <h2 class="entry-title">
<a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/2016/01/27/the-guadeloupe-woman-is-it-a-15th-century-or-28-million-year-old-skeleton/" rel="bookmark"><span style="background-color: black;">The Guadeloupe Woman: Is it a 15th century or 28 Million Year Old Skeleton?</span></a></h2>
<div class="entry-content">
In 1810 the British seized the French Island of Guadeloupe and sent a large stone slab back to England containing a skeleton of a headless and footless woman. This particular skeleton has become the object of controversy regarding the age of the skeleton and the Creation debate. We will discuss this skeleton and add to this debate.<br />
We came across this oddity when reading the website Bad <span class="skimlinks-unlinked">Archaelogy.wordpress.com</span> written by Keith Fitzpatrick Matthews, an English archaeologist. Frankly, his precision and attention to specific detail regarding the skeleton was refreshing even though it demonstrated a traditional and narrow perspective. We understand that science must be rigorous. We also understand that it is necessary for science to disprove various theories in order to get to an accurate and truthful assessment of any object, artefact, or skeleton. However, narrowness and rigid adherence to traditional methodologies do not guarantee correctness. Since science, itself, is an exercise in probabilistic truth; it can’t guarantee certainty.<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiK0jx-ljGK10FWwhb99yXgTdEu2HrHc-o2lVwAF_TQsdi8BRmu2Y7iglth3fxLc3FaQtgha_1DsHLnXE05uM0Dwc35v3S86CJhDMPVO3mhb_Om2UcCnWLw-ZZ4Gwvuoa4rRbbMdtNc80vb/s1600/TaylorIMMhgLadyFromGuadaloupeM.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="180" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiK0jx-ljGK10FWwhb99yXgTdEu2HrHc-o2lVwAF_TQsdi8BRmu2Y7iglth3fxLc3FaQtgha_1DsHLnXE05uM0Dwc35v3S86CJhDMPVO3mhb_Om2UcCnWLw-ZZ4Gwvuoa4rRbbMdtNc80vb/s320/TaylorIMMhgLadyFromGuadaloupeM.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
So, what do we have? Well, we have a skeleton found in a slab of rock one mile long with an unknown date of origin. Matthews states that the original investigator declared the stone to be a kind of sandstone made up of a concretion of calcareous sand. Well, so far so good. Additionally, Matthews tells us that there is a grave yard near the site of the skeleton’s excavation began at the time of Columbus’ discovery of the island in the Caribbean in 1493. Therefore, he believes this skeleton is not of Miocene age, 28 million to 5 million years old, but of a recent date, possibly in the 15<sup>th</sup> century.<br />
Now, this skeleton may indeed be a 15<sup>th</sup> century skeleton. However, it is not proven to be so. It still could be of a much older age even of 28 million years old. This skeleton’s age may not be “discredited” at all because of the probabilistic nature of science and the fact that a modern age has not been proven either. To properly determine its age one would have to examine the geology of the matrix surrounding the skeleton, examine the skeleton, itself, and properly study the geology of the island of Guadeloupe. To the best my knowledge, none of these things have been done. So, there is a real lack of evidence on the side of traditional “mainline” archaeology to support a claim of a recent, 15<sup>th</sup> century, age for this skeleton.<br />
Now, can we find any other evidence to support a claim of an older age? Yes! First, the skeleton was imbedded in rock. This is a process that takes some time. Second, we can consider a new technique, one that I have pioneered, that is the use of plate tectonics – the movement of the continental plates.<br />
If we do this we arrive at an unexpected surprise. Guadeloupe, as with all the islands of the West Indies rest on the Caribbean plate and neither on the North America nor South American plates. This means if we extend the location of Guadeloupe backward in time we find that at the end of the Cretaceous Period, 66 million years ago, it was located south to southwest of the Yucatan. With the meteorite impact that killed the dinosaurs, a huge tidal wave of 1100 feet in height flooded all of Mexico and the surrounding area and could have carried bodies of individuals to Guadeloupe. A closer look at the eastern side of the island shows an indentation that could have been caused by this tidal wave. Of course additional geological research is needed to confirm this.<br />
So, we claim that the skeleton has not been discredited until further research is done. Furthermore, the fact of the Caribbean plate movements due place Guadeloupe much closer to the Yucatan opens the door to the possibility that the skeleton maybe not 28 million years old but 66 million years old. The question is still open.</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-51045127692140018412016-01-06T03:50:00.002-08:002016-01-06T03:50:16.922-08:00What If Time Was Infinite....Give Or Take A Billion Years<h2 class="entry-title">
<em>What if time were infinite in both directions, past and future? Think about this for a minute. What we have is eternity and that would be necessary for the universe to exist. This challenges the Big Bang Theory of the origin of the universe and puts us at odds with mainline academic science.</em></h2>
<div class="entry-content">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZ6CRDL_IzINCyv6p132ORMyaMtMbyLjKhq8dbxFeeuooRW2_Tyw2kmEUovbbItuXdw_SYiuoCgas4mPpSNeFidi26U1At6qA3ERbdALzsX7CWZTnSSEEn63R8V5SYvlK5qDvzvqIJDS7O/s1600/multiverse.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="224" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZ6CRDL_IzINCyv6p132ORMyaMtMbyLjKhq8dbxFeeuooRW2_Tyw2kmEUovbbItuXdw_SYiuoCgas4mPpSNeFidi26U1At6qA3ERbdALzsX7CWZTnSSEEn63R8V5SYvlK5qDvzvqIJDS7O/s640/multiverse.jpg" width="640" /></a>The Electric Theory of the universe allows for eternity. This means that there is really no way to determine the age of the universe. Now reconsider my research that indicates that intelligent life has existed on our world for upwards of one billion years. Ask yourself: “What is a billion years compared to eternity?” The answer would: “Not very much”. That is the point. A billion years compared to eternity is meaningless. So, a billion year old civilization on earth is not an extreme idea and should not be rejected out of hand.<br />
Some may argue that there is no proof for the Electric Theory of the universe. However, there is really no proof for the Big Bang Theory either. Although both theories have experimental support, neither can be considered proven, at least not in the sense that mathematical theorems are proven.<br />
Another way to consider this is that the universe is the sum total of all possible outcomes for the given inputs at the specific time of the observation (today, yesterday, tomorrow). Evolution can be viewed in this way also. It is not so much that life forms evolve but that as time passes the various conditions (inputs) change so life is forced to change. Although we view this change as evolution it is actually the result of the process of the constant change in the universe.<br />
Applying this to the Earth, we find our planet existing in a dynamic solar system, one that like the universe changes with time. As change occurs, the Earth must also change and so too does life. So, what we have with intelligent life, is what is possible at the “time” of its existence. Even if the solar system is only 5 billion years old and the universe 14 billion years old this would still be the case.<br />
Now, our research has come across the artifacts released by the Mexican Government in 2012 that show cone headed beings and inter-planetary space travel. Such an artifact provides substantiation for an ancient intelligent society of non-humans existing at the time of Rodinia, i.e. 900-750 million years ago. This argues that intelligent life on our world is the result of various inputs that made such life possible at that time. In fact, it indicates that our solar system may have be capable of harboring intelligent life from an extremely early epoch.<br />
Although we do not know how or why this is possible, it seems to be the case. Furthermore, there seems to be evidence that the solar system underwent significant changes and wide-spread destruction and that life re-established itself.<br />
There is the possibility that archaeology may have discovered proof, or at least evidence for this. Specifically, Teotihuacan may offer this evidence. Peter Tompkins in his book “Mysteries of the Mexican Pyramids” discusses the theory that the site lay-out of this city may have been modeled after the solar system and the location of various structures indicate the location of the planets in the solar system with an error of 2 per cent. What if this was not an error but actually indicated the relative positions of the planets at the time of the construction of the city. We have calculated that this city is 70 million years old. A 2 per cent change in 70 million years may seem insignificant, however, if this change accumulates at a regular rate, we would have a change in planet positions of almost 22 per cent 750 million years ago. This was the time that Rodinia broke apart. Rogue planets would also be possible.<br />
This presents us with the possibility that the ancients built Teotihuacan as an absolute reference marker for future generations so they would have access to their scientific knowledge to restore civilization in the event it was destroyed.<br />
Mainline science currently knows that life was destroyed on our planet many times in various mass extinctions. Now, it seems that there is a real possibility that intelligent life was also destroyed and managed to re-established itself. We are the intelligent beings that have re-established intelligent life after the destructions of these ancients. We do not know who or what they were or where the originated from, never-the-less, we are here and must study these ancients.</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-70700000532247958422015-12-19T17:06:00.003-08:002015-12-19T17:06:32.076-08:00Alien Attack On Mars - Just Ask Mr. BlackCan you believe this? An American PhD (where else?) published an article in the Journal of Cosmology on November 20, 2014 and in it he stated that an alien thermonuclear bomb attack destroyed the ancient civilization on Mars. WOW!<br />
Actually, in his paper, Dr. John Brandenburg does a good job of defending his theory and he believes that this explains the Fermi Paradox of why aliens (ET) are not visiting Earth today.<br />
Dr. Brandenburg uses NASA data of isotope distribution to defend his conclusions. He sees the similarity of the distribution of these isotopes to the result of atomic testing in the atmosphere here on Earth. Furthermore, he identifies two separate blasts, one of which was a planet killer or 10 billion megatons. Without getting into a discussion of isotopes we will make a few comments about his implications of his work.<br />
First, we must state that an explosion of 10 billion megatons seems to us to be too large to be an artificial event. We think that a meteor of loosely packed material that included both uranium and thorium would be a more likely cause of the destruction of Mars. Although the explosion would not be thermonuclear, the large amount of uranium and thorium would poison Mars because it would have been distributed throughout the planet. In any case, the destruction would still be as extensive.<br />
Second, Dr. Brandenburg offers a date of 180 million years ago as the time of the blast. In fact, the doctor states that the explosion could have occurred at an even older date. Well, if we just accept his dating then we have an extreme challenge to modern mainline science because he states that the Mars Civilization bears similarities to both the Egyptians and Mayans on Earth. <br />
Although he does not say that the civilizations on Mars directly influenced or caused the civilizations on Earth, it is very hard not to think that this is the case. Let us face facts. Given that both the Earth and Mars had civilizations of similar cultural characteristics it would seem obvious that the one on Mars which dates to 180 million years ago would have at least influenced the Earth civilizations. This tends to push the age of Earth’s Egyptian and Mayan Civilizations to 180 million years ago if not even older. This is a strong challenge to modern mainline science. Maybe we are descended from ET.<br />
In one of our posts on this blog we discussed the possibility that Mars may have been destroyed 250 million years ago. See our post “Was Mars Destroyed 250 Million Years Ago” posted in June 16, 2014. Well, it seems from a brief examination of Dr. Brandenburg’s article that we were more right than wrong. <br />
We want to thank Dr. John Brandenburg for his research and article and welcome his future work.Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-11409599325164343262015-12-10T15:28:00.003-08:002015-12-10T15:28:23.663-08:00Happy Holidays From Mr. Black<h2 class="entry-title">
We wish to extend holiday greetings to all of our readers during this holiday season. Best Wishes to all of you and thank you for visiting our blog.</h2>
<div class="entry-content">
We also wish to ask you to email us with your questions and comments. We enjoy communicating with our readers. Email us at: black2tell@<span class="skimlinks-unlinked">yahoo.com</span>.<br />
By the way, our 100 page, limited edition book, Secrets of Lost Earth is still available. Contact us if you are interested in this book.<br />
We also do public presentations on our research and if you know of a group that would like to sponsor one of our talks please contact us.<br />
Again, please accept our greetings for this holiday season. Mr. Black</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-91980834462110386122015-11-27T16:29:00.001-08:002015-11-27T16:29:14.096-08:00Mr. Black Asks: How Old Are The Ica Stones Of Peru? <h2 class="entry-title">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJbyvmd6GsZjTo2WI6uZJ8psY9W03ktYWqlh1MgGFhdOdBiPqBQi6J4YVdx33wsDvODtLihtXPa4RvqB0GhwaPaaCMFDCNzyCQc71TW-kQ0H8GxHEQvSNwsMGDAIndT0Jzv569wPH6kq3D/s1600/Chronicle-of-the-Ica-Stones-Ancient-History-Creationists-Evolution-Evidence-Enigma-Mystery-Inca-Records-Noah-Enoch-Pre-Flood-World.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="253" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhJbyvmd6GsZjTo2WI6uZJ8psY9W03ktYWqlh1MgGFhdOdBiPqBQi6J4YVdx33wsDvODtLihtXPa4RvqB0GhwaPaaCMFDCNzyCQc71TW-kQ0H8GxHEQvSNwsMGDAIndT0Jzv569wPH6kq3D/s320/Chronicle-of-the-Ica-Stones-Ancient-History-Creationists-Evolution-Evidence-Enigma-Mystery-Inca-Records-Noah-Enoch-Pre-Flood-World.jpg" width="320" /></a><a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/2015/06/15/could-the-ica-stones-be-86-million-years-old/" rel="bookmark"><span style="color: black;">Could the Ica Stones be 86 Million Years Old?</span></a> </h2>
<!-- .entry-meta -->Well, here we are again dating something back many millions of years. As we read back over our blog posts we have the same feeling of unbelief at the very dates we have demonstrated. Oh yes, they have been demonstrated and they keep getting older and older.<br />
<div class="entry-content">
Why are they so very old? They are so very old because new scientific discoveries have provided researchers with new tools to study the past. One of the most important of these tools is plate tectonics, the study of the movement of the Earth’s continental plates. Oh, for those of you who don’t know the continents do move. This is scientific fact.<br />
Well, in addition to plate tectonics, paleontologists who study dinosaurs have recently discovered that dinosaurs only gained their great size in the last 20 million years of their existence, between 86 million to 66 million years ago. Before that time, dinosaurs were about the size of human beings today. (Scientific American May 2015) Now, with this new information we can re-examine the Ica Stones again. <br />
Before we do this let us review what the Ica Stones are. They are engraved stones found near the town of Ica in Peru. These stones were originally discovered by a medical doctor Javier Caberra and kept in a small private museum in Ica. These engraved stones have images of dinosaurs, strange animal life, and what look like humans beings – doctor Caberra called them “proto-humans”.<br />
So, how do we get such an old date for the Ica Stones? Well, when you examine the Ica Stones closely, you notice that they appear to depict small dinosaurs. In fact, even the images of the “proto-humans” shown illustrate these beings as smaller than we are now. For all this to be an accurate depiction of reality it would have to show images from a time at least 86 million years ago. <br />
Now, let us not get excited. Although the images may indeed represent scenes that are that old, the Ica Stones, themselves, could have been copied and recopied. It is the images that represent creatures that are at least 86 million years old. </div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-33699504560586616602015-11-15T16:29:00.001-08:002015-11-15T16:29:17.270-08:00Mr. Black and The Pyramid On Ceres<h2 class="entry-title">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_fQhvousvsxe-H_F7S7dJCCVwL2lQp3usOH2KS4TRmeIM9Ox8wunFhL6Ba2_mfrq2FwHlGkXOSvmjpn8SlDu-PT1RFjDNRhkL1jUIFcOr9d4muaZyZZmlHrxpYoa_i8TG7AHJHZ8YgmSd/s1600/s-CERES-PYRAMID-MOUNTAIN-large640.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="234" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh_fQhvousvsxe-H_F7S7dJCCVwL2lQp3usOH2KS4TRmeIM9Ox8wunFhL6Ba2_mfrq2FwHlGkXOSvmjpn8SlDu-PT1RFjDNRhkL1jUIFcOr9d4muaZyZZmlHrxpYoa_i8TG7AHJHZ8YgmSd/s320/s-CERES-PYRAMID-MOUNTAIN-large640.jpg" width="320" /></a><a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/2015/08/11/is-the-four-mile-high-mountain-on-ceres-a-massive-monument/" rel="bookmark">Could the Four Mile High Mountain on Ceres be a Massive Monument?</a> </h2>
<!-- .entry-meta --> <br />
<div class="entry-content">
The solar system is a mysterious place. Neither its true origin nor its original inhabitants are known. Science only makes an educated guess about them through theory, computer simulation, and evolution.<br />
The NASA Dawn Probe spacecraft has only contributed to this mystery. Specifically, it has <br />
returned photographic images of the dwarf planet Ceres that show us more inexplicable phenomenon. The images show us bright spots in a two mile deep crater and bright streaks on a four mile high pyramid mountain. These photographs seem to indicate that this pyramid mountain may be artificial.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUnOe3vjSTdvCPaERTIn-h4dNiNSz5lSXL-fh98mGbPBivgeIKdlA4YU5iBPmGEOMgt7lbzQIXypiPTTP1ZEb4h_Q1EqvKoGO4CPIzIN1e3hGYVvijMtizMkjF-qUWiPdVXxFf8IfvUn2L/s1600/Glowing+Pyramid+Mountain+on+Planet+Ceres+-+July+2015.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="190" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUnOe3vjSTdvCPaERTIn-h4dNiNSz5lSXL-fh98mGbPBivgeIKdlA4YU5iBPmGEOMgt7lbzQIXypiPTTP1ZEb4h_Q1EqvKoGO4CPIzIN1e3hGYVvijMtizMkjF-qUWiPdVXxFf8IfvUn2L/s320/Glowing+Pyramid+Mountain+on+Planet+Ceres+-+July+2015.png" width="320" /></a>NASA has released a short video narrated by Marc Rayman of Jet Propulsion Laboratories. The video shows us a rotating down looking view of this amazing mountain. My first impression is that it is a carved monument with a face looking to the sky. This is a monument four miles high and over 413 million kilometers from Earth.<br />
There have been many people who have claimed evidence of past civilization in the solar system. There have also been many people who point to anomalous artifacts and structures on earth to justify their claims of ET. However, this discovery has to be placed among the most anomalous and inexplicable. Even so, my research over the past six years may shed some light on this recent discovery.<br />
Let us begin with the pyramid mountain, itself. As the video shows (<span class="skimlinks-unlinked">www.nasa.gov/missions</span>), the mountain has multiple flat sharp angled sides. This can not be a natural feature. The NASA video refers to them as bright streaks. Look closely and you will notice that bright streaks rest along the edges of the sides that are flat, and angled. There are at least 11 angled sides making the mountain look like a massive carved monument. Furthermore, the image is looking upwards similar to images on Mars and Earth. <br />
The image looks like a cone headed individual shown on carvings on Easter Island, Brazil, and artifacts released by the Mexican Government in 2012. These images indicate that there was an ancient civilization on earth that had acquired the ability of space flight during the time of the super continent Rodinia. This continent broke apart over 750 million years ago.<br />
Why did this civilization become extinct? The reason is not known but there seems to be the real possibility that there was some kind of massive destruction in the solar system itself. The details of this solar system destruction are currently unknown.</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-76985112115647984472015-11-08T17:11:00.002-08:002015-11-08T17:11:26.673-08:00Mr. Black Explains - Snowball Earth<h2 class="entry-title">
<a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/2015/08/23/snowball-earth/" rel="bookmark">SNOWBALL EARTH</a> </h2>
<!-- .entry-meta --><br />
<div class="entry-content">
Earth died 715 million years ago. Its lifeless carcass rested in the dark stillness of space wrapped in the pall of massive world-wide glaciers 5,000 meters thick for 120 million years. This was the time of snowball earth.<br />
Snowball earth is a theory put forth to explain glacial deposits in the tropics back in 1992.<br /> It is real science and there is real evidence to support the theory. It is important because it is the mask that the covers the real age of life on earth. Snowball Earth introduces a systematic error in the geological dating of the terrestrial expansion of life onto land of at least 175 million years.<br />
Here is how. Geology has established what is known as the Cambium Explosion at 542 million years ago. This is the base line for fossils. There are no fossils older than 560 million years of complex multi-cellular life on the surface of our planet. Therefore, from a geological perspective, terrestrial life began on the surface land at that time.<br />
The systemic error enters the picture because of the glaciers. Life would die and be held in a frozen state for 120 million years. Fossilization can only begin after the glaciers melt. There is no sedimentation to cover the dead animal before this time. So, all geological dating based on fossils begin here and dates the time of fossilization not the date of the animal’s death. Since Snowball Earth began 715 million years ago and ended 595 million years ago, this time frame must be added to fossil dated to get a more accurate date. In fact, the added time from 595 to 540 must also be included meaning that at least 175 million years must be added to the start of the Cambium.<br />
WOW! A 175 million year error in dating indicates that the Cambium was not the date of life’s origin on land but the date of its re-appearance on land. The Earth died 715 million years ago and was resurrected 540 million years ago.<br />
In our essays located on this blog, “Did Earth Have Intelligent Life 1.1 Billion Years ago?” and “Reasons Why a Billion Year Old Civilization on Earth is Possible”, we discuss the possibly of a civilization on the super continent Rodinia and why there is a problem dating this far back. We conclude that the ancient civilization is masked. Well, it is and that mask is Snowball Earth. Science can not date beyond 540 million years because of the systematic error caused by the glaciations of the surface of the planet.<br />
Our estimate is that complex multi-cellular terrestrial life began much earlier in the past, possibly 1.1 billion years ago. This date now makes sense given that Snowball Earth is the source of systematic error in geological dating.</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-29846141190802071452015-10-04T17:22:00.002-07:002015-10-04T17:22:26.806-07:00Did Earth Have Intelligent Life 1.1 Billion Years Ago? <h2 class="entry-title">
Could intelligent life on Earth be 1.1 billion to 750 million years old? Yes, this is a serious question and yes, there is evidence for this. Unbelievable as it may seem it is something that science needs to consider. Here is what I mean.</h2>
<div class="entry-content">
In 2012 the Mexican Government released photos of artifacts that show “cone head” creatures together with what seems to be images of interplanetary “space flight”. These artifacts were found near Ojuelos de Jalisco in Mexico and were kept as a state secret for 80 years.<br />
However, what is more amazing is that these artifacts depict images that represent the planets and the Earth at an extremely ancient epoch. In an earlier post I speculated about a 300 to 400 million year old civilization because of these images. Now, with a little more study, I noticed something quite remarkable. One of the images seems to depict an ancient supercontinent on Earth that looks very much like the super continent named Rodinia. <br />
What is Rodinia? Rodinia is a hypothesized supercontinent that contained all or mostly all of the land mass of Earth. The name Rodinia means “The Motherland” and was named by McMenamin & McMenamim back in 1990. (See Wikipedia) According to plate tectonic reconstruction, Rodinia existed between 1.1 billion to 750 Million years ago. (Wikipedia)<br />
This is not all. The particular artifact in question depicts an image of a world we believe to be Earth, with an ice field in orbit around it. The image also depicts what can be considered the moon surrounded by a massive debris field and an out stretched arm extending from the upside down triangle or spear shaped land mass reaching to another planet. The outstretched arm has a hand with the middle finger touching the other planet. The hand has no thumb.<br />
If the large land mass shown is Rodinia, then the arm extends from what scientists call the South American and West Africa cratons. These cratons are the large land blocks that eventually became West Africa and Brazil.<br />
The identification of the image of this artifact with Rodinia may lead to the solution of several mysteries. One is that the collapse of the ice field around the Earth could have resulted in a flood that washed out this ancient civilization. This could be the flood of Noah.<br />
Another is the origin of humanity and the so called “Garden of Eden”. The outstretched arm seems to place this geographically in the area of Brazil and West Africa. <br />
Another is evolution and creation. The cone heads may have been the original Adam and Eve and we “descended from them”. The process of descent would appear to modern science as evolution. We obviously are very different from the cone heads depicted in the artifact.<br />
Finally, the possibility of an ancient space going civilization estimated to be 250 million years old. Our ancient ancestors may have been responsible for this. Keep in mind that an origin for intelligent life from between 1.1 billion to 750 million years ago allows more than enough time for an ancient civilization to develop space flight. Of course, this is only speculation based on images of one artifact and more data is necessary. <br />
One more point, if intelligent life on Earth did begin during the time of Rodinia, then modern mainline science needs to greatly alter its theories about both the origin of life in general as-well-as the origin of intelligent life on Earth. </div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-35698145485135292462015-09-30T18:42:00.000-07:002015-09-30T18:42:44.300-07:00Mr. Black Explains the Mysterious Pyramid of Alaska<h2 class="entry-title">
<a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/2015/07/23/the-mysterious-pyramid-of-alaska/" rel="bookmark">The Mysterious Pyramid of Alaska</a></h2>
<div class="entry-meta">
It has been awhile since we last heard from Mr. Black. I recently learned about the appearance of a mysterious Pyramid in Alaska......The following is Mr. Black's knowledge of the mystery. </div>
<!-- .entry-meta --> <br />
<div class="entry-content">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwzCaldHpCJMVUmsUodecvx9qc1GwzCPtetjCMfcCzXKx3XNF46jfDuXAucFvR4C3TpCZY_qNJWkHxjhyphenhyphenauH1-w3J3sKLHOMFlDL8FqY8Sry4se1TSAphsVV230ncwWkJMbxoBHv0b0LCO/s1600/utica.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="194" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhwzCaldHpCJMVUmsUodecvx9qc1GwzCPtetjCMfcCzXKx3XNF46jfDuXAucFvR4C3TpCZY_qNJWkHxjhyphenhyphenauH1-w3J3sKLHOMFlDL8FqY8Sry4se1TSAphsVV230ncwWkJMbxoBHv0b0LCO/s320/utica.jpg" width="320" /></a>The mysterious pyramid of Alaska may very well be 825 Million Years Old. Fantastic as it seems, it never-the-less appears to be the true age of the pyramid, or at least as true as we can discover.<br />
First, let us state that we are not even certain that this pyramid even exists. We have only read internet reports and have no first hand knowledge about the pyramid. Even so, we can do a preliminary analysis and attempt to find its age. This is possible because the continents move and any geographic location can be traced backward in time.<br />
Now, let us proceed to a discussion of the pyramid. This pyramid is supposed to be located 50 miles west of Mt. McKinley at coordinates 63° 17´ N and 152° 31´ W. It was discovered after China tested an atomic bomb on May 22, 1992 and geo-scientists used the shock wave produced by the explosion to study the earth’s crust. <br />
Just how can we date this pyramid? This is not as difficult as it may seem. All we need do is a “thought experiment”. Dr. Albert Einstein did the same type of experiments when he proposed the theory of relativity. <br />
What we did is ask ourselves was where was this pyramid located in the past. Since all the continents move and their direction and speed have been discovered by “legitimate mainline science”, we simply looked at various maps of where Alaska would have been located in the past. Here, we must state that Alaska rests on the North American Plate which in the ancient past was part of Laurentia. <br />
The location of Laurentia has been mapped all the way back to the super continent of Rodinia that existed between 1.1 billion to 750 million years ago. Furthermore, Laurentia bordered the 800 – 700 million year old rift between Laurentia and what is now East Antartica and Australia. <br />
Even though the exact geographic location of the pyramid in Rodinia is not known; we set the pyramid’s location to the site of the closest approach to earth of an orbital celestial body we call Luna Prime. This, we believe, was a past moon of earth that broke-up in orbit leaving a massive debris field. Today, this site rests over Sault Saint Marie in the United States and Canada.<br />
Positioning the pyramid at this point of closest approach to Earth dates the Alaska pyramid to approximately 825 million years age. The date is approximate because of a lack of precise paleo cartographic maps that locate the ancient continents. However, this date seems reasonable in light of other evidence.<br />
Some of this evidence includes artifacts released by the Mexican Government in 2012 that depict “cone head” individuals with the image of Rodinia. Also, the Ica stones of Peru provide images of dinosaurs with “proto-people” that had a civilization in the extreme ancient past.<br /> Additional evidence includes some of our research with impact craters and the discovery of the orbit of Luna Prime and our dating of various archaeological sites particularly in Mexico. <br />
What this pyramid in Alaska actually communicates to us is that an extremely ancient intelligent non human civilization once existed on Earth at the time of Rodinia circa 825 million years ago. </div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-29703403485413397632015-02-18T15:44:00.000-08:002015-02-18T15:44:14.506-08:00The Battle Of Los Angeles<h2 class="entry-title">
<a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/2013/09/14/the-battle-of-los-angeles-a-classic-ufo-encounter/" rel="bookmark" sl-processed="1">The Battle of Los Angeles: A Classic UFO Encounter</a> </h2>
<!-- .entry-meta --> <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTBMcy9qKHjnBTrjDkNKMaCnE4u_ry-fwk4emm0OEvZP5xD0jvQGYhg_NLlYAfPOFz9S5fPCxm5gYkmN8terr-kebqvyQOjQt2Qq_E28XPK-4Cm5iSsCtuK4_Mbs07L8Hp6gVqMHiBAmWd/s1600/battleoflosangeles.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTBMcy9qKHjnBTrjDkNKMaCnE4u_ry-fwk4emm0OEvZP5xD0jvQGYhg_NLlYAfPOFz9S5fPCxm5gYkmN8terr-kebqvyQOjQt2Qq_E28XPK-4Cm5iSsCtuK4_Mbs07L8Hp6gVqMHiBAmWd/s1600/battleoflosangeles.jpg" height="258" width="320" /></a><br />
<div class="entry-content">
The classic UFO encounter called “The Battle of Los Angeles” occurred on February 25, 1942. What happened? Mysterious lights were seen 120 miles out to sea and slowly drifted over the city. The army, which was responsible for anti-aircraft defense, began firing on the lights and although no aircraft were shot down three innocent civilians were killed.<br />
The media blitz that followed fostered hysteria, charges and counter charges by the army and navy, and claims that there was a Japanese air base in Mexico. Even to this day the US Government has not explained what happened. The whole incident was blamed on “war nerves”.<br />
If we examine the technological history of the United States we find that this whole episode can be explained with military technology developed and demonstrated back in 1935. In fact, we can explain why World War II was fought the way it was and why the Cold War occurred. Additionally, much of the “tug of war” of the second half of the 20<sup>th</sup> century becomes understandable in terms of the need to deploy this technology, none of which is extra-terrestrial.<br />
So, what was this technology? This technology was non-orbital high altitude observation and communications platforms. These platforms were developed by a US Army Air Corps Intelligence officer named Captain Albert Stevens. On November 11, 1935, Stevens together with Captain Orville Anderson flew a high altitude helium filled balloon to 72,395 feet or 13 miles high. This balloon ascension was sponsored by the National Geographic Society.<br />
The balloon was 300 feet tall and formed a ball 192 feet in diameter. It carried a 9 ton magnesium alloy gondola, nine feet in diameter. This craft was fully pressurized and allowed the crew to operate one ton of scientific, communications, and photographic equipment in a shirt sleeve environment. Their 8 watt AM radio could talk with aircraft 1500 miles away. Their camera could photograph objects 175 miles away with black and white film and 350 miles away with infrared film.<br />
So, what does this have to do with “The Battle of Los Angeles”? Simple! High altitude manned balloons fly in the direction of the prevailing winds. In 1942, the US Navy had an air station on San Clemente Island off the coast of San Diego. The prevailing winds from San Clemente Island move from Southwest to Northeast and would put any balloon flight over the City of Los Angeles. Recovery would occur in the desert to the Northeast of the city.<br />
<div class="wpcnt">
</div>
</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-70702144435840828512015-02-17T04:29:00.000-08:002015-02-17T04:29:23.673-08:00Doubt Mr. Black Is Real? Come See Him Tonight At The Dunham LibraryMr. Black is very real. Check him out tonight at the Dunham Library in Whitesboro New York. See the man behind the blog and a future book. Hear his explanations of why he believe intelligent life was here before humans. 6:30 tonight. See you there.Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-13410363887655797642015-02-11T18:57:00.001-08:002015-02-11T18:57:35.878-08:00Mr. Black - Zombies Really Exist...Bizarre Tale From Utica NY<h2 class="entry-title">
I have read some of Mr. Black's stories with great interest. Usually I am taken around the world. I found a local story that I never knew about regarding zombies. Mr. Black shares the story of a local legend regarding zombies. </h2>
<h2 class="entry-title">
Mr. Black: Zombies really exist in America. Yes! Proof exists. This is the story of one case that happened back in 1999 and it was covered-up by the local authorities.</h2>
<div class="entry-content">
What happened?<br />
A retired postal carrier decided to pick-up a prostitute to celebrate his 72<sup>nd</sup> birthday and while she was “helping him celebrate” her boyfriend killed him. However, although his body was put into a dumpster near where he was killed, a witness testified in open court that she saw the postal carrier walking down the road at the time of his death. This qualifies the retired postal carrier as a “ZOMBIE”. He walked while he was dead. His body was found one mile from where he was killed.<br />
The story becomes even more bizarre since both the prostitute and her boyfriend were mixed-up in Voodoo. Voodoo is a religion in Haiti and the killers were also involved with Haitian drug dealers.<br />
Where did this happen?<br />
The killing occurred off Barnes Ave. near the Mohawk River in Utica, New York. The route the zombie walked was west on Oriskany Blvd and the body was found in a field in Yorkville, New York.<br />
What was the result?<br />
The killers were tried and convicted of causing the death of the postal carrier even though the cause of death was not determined. Both killers were sent to jail and the prostitute died in prison.<br />
What now?<br />
This author attempted to interview witnesses and people involved with this case. The witness who saw the postal carrier walk down the street at the time of his death refused to meet with me out of fear. This was several years after the trial. Furthermore, this authored was “warned off” by a local police officer, (not from the City of Utica), and blocked in his attempts to fully explore this case. However, this author did talk with a priest who knew the family and the case and was told of the Voodoo connection.<br />
This is what you can do.<br />
Why not help me bring attention to this case and get the facts made public. There is no reason, at least as I know of, that justifies the secrecy. What I suggest is that those of you, who are able, walk the route of the zombie, along Oriskany Blvd from Barnes Ave to Yorkville, a distance of one mile, on Halloween night to publicize this case.</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-42781869136388147322015-02-03T13:56:00.002-08:002015-02-03T13:57:13.452-08:00THE EASTER ISLAND MYSTERY<h2 class="entry-title">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhVf3jYPBdomGQh1ZoJ8dUQ36M_gWKQcp4gPxdgBC7JVq-Whu7BYcYcDWx4pa8ZR0evIznU2JK9OURGbbtrpOT9DkolOTc8fvGyeEJcPli6HOCsXZMvpyROEuFK65uwpeS3RUL3NpjsgzZG/s1600/AhuTongariki.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhVf3jYPBdomGQh1ZoJ8dUQ36M_gWKQcp4gPxdgBC7JVq-Whu7BYcYcDWx4pa8ZR0evIznU2JK9OURGbbtrpOT9DkolOTc8fvGyeEJcPli6HOCsXZMvpyROEuFK65uwpeS3RUL3NpjsgzZG/s1600/AhuTongariki.jpg" height="240" width="320" /></a>Easter Island has always been a mystery. It’s in the middle of nowhere over 2,000 miles away from Peru. “How could anyone find it let alone travel there?” Then, there are also those heads, those very large carved stone heads, some of them thirty feet tall. Who made them and how did they move them? No one knows. They are not the real mystery of Easter Island.</h2>
<div class="entry-content">
The real mystery of Easter Island is sublime. Easter Island holds the keys to unlock a far greater mystery. It’s a mystery that tells us how God made man or even if a God exists. It’s a mystery connected with the of origin of the human lineage. Easter Island is a diamond buried in an enigma of volcanic rock that tells us how we came to be.<br />
Before we can even begin to understand, we have to consider some of the archeological artifacts of Peru. These artifacts are found in a place called ICA. It is there where a small museum holds a treasure of engraved stones. No one knows who engraved them or what significance they hold. However, they do show what looks like people coexisting with dinosaurs. What?! Yes, I said dinosaurs.<br />
The artifacts we need to consider are the ICA stones. These stones were studied by medical doctor Javier Cabrera Darquera who established a museum in the town of ICA. Dr. Cabrera believed they tell the history of earth 70 million years ago. Before we continue, we must state that science does not accept the ICA stones.<br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjliDjb0sBn5m1Bee5yuLkTRQkwRwMym_vDrdp9PeidvOhdGDUkeaTmCPWLMpL4YP8H7LMj3WCkTuoZDTlbSD6nu0QlPsOunnrw4f_aDXqbxh6Lt44XSsZAHJc1M4g_pEnvSCJSeTmX90zF/s1600/Easter-Island-Heads.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjliDjb0sBn5m1Bee5yuLkTRQkwRwMym_vDrdp9PeidvOhdGDUkeaTmCPWLMpL4YP8H7LMj3WCkTuoZDTlbSD6nu0QlPsOunnrw4f_aDXqbxh6Lt44XSsZAHJc1M4g_pEnvSCJSeTmX90zF/s1600/Easter-Island-Heads.jpg" height="218" width="320" /></a>So, what’s so special about the ICA stones? They show images of individuals that look like people with dinosaurs. The stones show these individuals riding dinosaurs, hunting dinosaurs, and dinosaurs killing these individuals. Because of this, creationists believe that humans and dinosaurs coexisted. This is not the case.<br />
What we actually discover with close examination of the ICA stones is that the individuals are really not people. They look like and even act like people but they are not people. Dr. Cabrera called them “proto-people”.<br />
How are they different? Well, they have large expression less faces; large, elephant like ears; long “snouts” instead of noses; an extreme slant forehead; and hands with no thumbs. Since they have no thumbs, they are not anthropoids and therefore not human. They are an ancient form of human ancestor, an intermediate form of human, and therefore prove that evolution is fact. However, there is no evidence of a monkey ancestor.<br />
Now, let us consider why we should accept the ICA stones as real and not accept science’s rejection of the ICA stones. Well, we should accept the ICA stones because they are both “internally” and “externally” consistent. By this we mean that all the images in the stones are consistent with what science has discovered about the ancient past (externally consistent). Also, the images on the stones display only what would be expected of the ancient past and show no mixture of ancient life forms with modern technology. In short they tell the truth and “real scientific facts” are the truth. They can not be hoaxed.<br />
Let’s simplify this. If you had a telescope and saw the planet Saturn with its rings and moons and then drew an image of what you saw your image would be an accurate depiction of Saturn. There is no way someone could do this unless they either saw Saturn or had access to some other kind of scientific information about the planet. This is true for all science, be it cell structure, DNA’s double helix, or even the lay-out of our solar system with all its planets. Truth can not be hoaxed.<br />
Well, now what? Look again at the individuals depicted on the ICA stones and we see that they resemble the images carved on the large stone heads of Easter Island. WOW! Both Easter Island and Peru have images of the same kind of individuals and they indicate that these individual date to the time of the dinosaurs, 65 million years ago.<br />
Furthermore, the ICA stones indicate that the ancients also had modern human behaviors. For example, they studied the stars, performed medical procedures, cut each others hair, had entertainment, and worshiped. These are modern human behaviors. They are very much like us but physically different. So, that which defines human behavior was laid down a very long time ago.<br />
So, although science is correct in claiming that human beings are recent, human behavior is ancient in the extreme. This means that some kind of cultural transmission from the past must have come down to modern people. Part of this cultural transmission is the art of Easter Island which fills in some of the blank spaces in human evolution. This is awesome.<br />
What is the next step? Well, let’s look at the ICA stones again. In addition to the dinosaurs and individuals, we see images of other life forms. Two of them are of particular interest to us. One is the image of what looks like a short snake like creature with a triangular shaped head and two eyes. The other is a crab or lobster creature that has a segmented body, walks on two legs, has a large round head, and two “human like eyes” facing upward.<br />
Evolutionists have theorized that when life came onto land that the first creature to do this would have existed along the shore and had eyes on the top of its head. Well, our crab creature qualifies. You see, as a human being, your genetic heritage extends back a very long way, to these crabs, maybe 350 million years ago. There is some part of that crab’s DNA in you.<br />
Now, this crab has something very different about it. It is something that doesn’t exist in people today but when you think about it, makes sense. Its claws are inverted. The right claw is on the left arm and it left claw is on the right arm. Why? Think about it. This crab lived in a different ecological niche and had to adapt to life on land as it evolved. Nature knows what it’s doing. This inverted claw arrangement must have been a benefit to the crab while it was a crab but not when it became a terrestrial life form.<br />
Also, when you think about it, you realize that in humans the left side of the brain controls the right side of the body and the right side of the brain controls the left side of the body. This is a proof of the necessary change to survive on land by a creature adapted for water and coastal areas. The different ecological niche required the change.<br />
This knowledge lets us interpret some of the art of Easter Island, specifically the drawing of a triangular shaped headed, four legged animal with inverted, almost claw like front paws. This drawing has been interpreted as a monster but it actually depicts an animal that existed in the ancient past. This creature represents an evolutionary step from the snake to the crab to the “monster”. It was our study of the ICA stones that led us to this interpretation.<br />
Now, before considering additional Easter Island art, let us think out loud for a few minutes. Let’s see. A coastal creature moves on to land and has to adapt to a different ecological niche. Would this creature only adapt to just a direct linear path that lead to us? This doesn’t seem realistic. The creature would move into multiple ecological niches simultaneously and would survive where it could. This means that we should find “other” kinds of creatures with some “human like” characteristics. This is what we find.<br />
The Easter Island art has a carved stone statue of a four legged creature with a “human like face”. It reminds me of a small dog. Gee! Can you image a dog that looks like your uncle Charlie? In the extreme ancient past, animals would look a lot alike while being different. This human faced, dog like, animal is an example.<br />
Another is the “bird men”. Images drawn on the rocks show what look like humans with beaks and inverted hands. I told you we would find other creatures with human like characteristics.<br />
Additional carvings show an upright walking individual with a flat, oval head with a human face. It’s like looking at a walking wide headed snake or alligator.<br />
Easter Island preserves all of this for us. It tells us of our ancient past, our origin, and our true nature. Since our evolutionary ancestors did not survive until today in any other form, we must conclude that the only path that worked for our lineage is humanity. It’s almost as if we were destined, “right from the get go”, to become human beings. Is this proof that we were created by God? Each of us has to answer this question individually.</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-43521971223381048502015-01-30T19:40:00.002-08:002015-01-30T19:40:16.127-08:00Israel Finds Proof That The Earth Was Inhabited By Intelligent Non-Humans<h2 class="entry-title">
<em><u>On April 9, 2014 the Israeli Antiquities Authority announced that they discovered a sarcophagus decorated with the sculpted image of a serene looking individual and a sculpted image showing hands with no thumbs. The hands had five long fingers. Humans are anthropoids and therefore must have thumbs. This individual can not be human.<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5oxGA5NRVaQl8_w8dV5OQZUMPINEsT87-koLo_4wZ39mP_O0XxQyLerTB__nw-ZKC8rLspt-SYRbszO4NotVB6B1P0VoTXKAQUtCRwSIsoKgLDqHY-MEhZQQGy8cZPMVmIBpf0NHznhda/s1600/Clay-coffin-lid-det.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi5oxGA5NRVaQl8_w8dV5OQZUMPINEsT87-koLo_4wZ39mP_O0XxQyLerTB__nw-ZKC8rLspt-SYRbszO4NotVB6B1P0VoTXKAQUtCRwSIsoKgLDqHY-MEhZQQGy8cZPMVmIBpf0NHznhda/s1600/Clay-coffin-lid-det.jpg" height="234" width="320" /></a></div>
</u></em></h2>
<div class="entry-content">
Why is this important? It is important because thumbs are so much part of the human psychic that humans do not even consider sculpting hands without thumbs. This had to have been a deliberate act and not an accident.<br />
Furthermore, a sculpted image of hands without thumbs constitutes proof of the evolution of modern humans from a non human ancestor.<br />
In spite of this significance, the research scholars made no mention of the hands without thumbs. Why? Are they blind? It seems that both archaeology and Egyptology, as scholarly disciplines, have deliberately decided not to “see” these hands without thumbs. To do so, would put these disciplines at odds with the study of human origins and theory that humans and apes had a common ancestor.<br />
One other point, an individual without thumbs would have been an extremely ancient early ancestor of modern humans, possibly millions of years, and this also poses a challenge to both archaeology and Egyptology.<br />
An important thing to note is that this artifact, the Israeli sarcophagus, is not the only artifact to display this kind of image. The heads of Easter Islands also show individuals without thumbs and five long fingers and so do the Ica stones of Peru. This is not an isolated find.</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-86940138265952185902015-01-27T21:06:00.003-08:002015-01-27T21:06:24.849-08:00Thought You Knew Egyptian History....not so fast says Mr. Black.<h2 class="entry-title">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgSNS_98LkCHL9RfdEedv4mKivNmChOYW6O14iF4Csbcm4-kqbbt4JBHWVCFf0zF0dsRE2CPD2Iu6AD0nwtXL03IoXG8c8tLLFK77c5kuEzRl66aPLio_3bzhd0ZoWGOxU35fBI_phLO0jT/s1600/sphinx-front-wa-2001.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgSNS_98LkCHL9RfdEedv4mKivNmChOYW6O14iF4Csbcm4-kqbbt4JBHWVCFf0zF0dsRE2CPD2Iu6AD0nwtXL03IoXG8c8tLLFK77c5kuEzRl66aPLio_3bzhd0ZoWGOxU35fBI_phLO0jT/s1600/sphinx-front-wa-2001.jpg" height="214" width="320" /></a><a href="https://black2tell.wordpress.com/2014/08/12/the-great-egyptian-sphinx-a-new-look-at-an-old-monument/" rel="bookmark" sl-processed="1"><em><span style="color: black;">The Great Egyptian Sphinx: </span></em></a></h2>
<h2 class="entry-title">
<em>A New Look at an Old Monument</em> </h2>
<div class="entry-content">
One of the greatest archaeological anomalies on Earth is the Egyptian Sphinx. No one really knows who made it or when it was made. This is in spite of the claims of academic scholars. One reason for this is the dispute about its age between Geologists and Egyptologists. Egyptology claims an age of 4500 years old. Geology views things differently. <br />
We will discuss the published research of two scientists from the Ukraine. They are Vjacheslav I. Manichev and Alexander G. Parkhomenko. At the time their article was published, they were associated with the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Their paper dates the Sphinx at over 800,000 years old. Let us take a look.<br />
The current historical-archaeological methods used to date the Sphinx by Egyptologists can not be accepted by geology. That is because the Sphinx displays signs of water erosion that can not be explained by the current accepted age 4500 to 5000 years old. <br />
You can not have water erosion of the Sphinx unless it was built at a time when abundant water existed in Egypt. A date of 4500 to 5000 years is too recent a time for Egypt to have had abundant water because it was still a desert. Furthermore, a date of 13000 BC, a time of high humidity and pouring rains in Egypt, is still too recent a date to explain the water erosion found on the Sphinx.<br />
So, how do we date the water erosion? Well, Manichev and Parkhomenko have compared the erosion of the Sphinx with erosion along sea coasts and have discovered a similarity. In fact, geologists who specialize in sea coast geomorphology know this type of erosion as wave-cut hollows. They can be either one story or multi-storied erosion patterns. Wave-cut hollows are found horizontal to surface water and can cause cliffs as found on the Black Sea.<br />
Examination of the Great Egyptian Sphinx demonstrates that this pattern of erosion is found from the head to foot on this structure. This indicates that the Sphinx was at one time submerged. The total height equals 160 meters and lasted for considerable time. The various cut-hollows correspond to varying water levels over time.<br />
But what could have caused the submergence of the Sphinx? The answer seems to be increased water level of the Mediterranean which flooded the Nile Valley. This flooding of the Nile caused long-living water-bodies with a time estimate of 800,000 years. But the Sphinx had to have been built BEFORE this flooding. Therefore, it is possible for the Sphinx to be much older. <br />
With the support of geological research my belief of an extreme old age for ancient Egyptian civilization, 28 million years, becomes a real possibility and not mere conjecture. In any event, the origin and development of civilization on earth must be re-examined and current beliefs changed.<br />
<br />
References<br />
Vjacheslav I. Manichev and Alexander G. Parkhomenko. 2008. “Geological Aspect Of The Problem Of Dating The Great Egyptian Sphinx Construction” in Geoarchaeology and Archaeomineralogy, Eds. R.I. Kostov, B. Gaydarska, M. Gurova, Sofia.</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-17095709504225988882015-01-26T19:09:00.003-08:002015-01-26T19:09:37.547-08:00Did the Mayans Have A Connection With Mars?<h2 class="entry-title">
Did the earth harbor an extra-terrestrial civilization 65 million years ago? New research indicates this may be true. Let’s take a look.</h2>
<div class="entry-content">
In his book, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Dark Mission</span>, Richard Hoagland identifies the “Face on Mars” with the Maya. The “Face on Mars” refers to a feature on the planet Mars that looks like a human face. It was photograph by the Viking spacecraft in 1976. He also states that Mars was destroyed 65 million years ago. Well, if Mr. Hoagland is correct, then, we have to accept this extreme age for the Mayans. If this so, we need to find proof here on Earth.<br />
Actually, it may be possible to get proof of such an extreme old age for the Mayans. To do this it is necessary to change the way we view the Mayan civilization. Since today’s science does not accept human existence beyond 200,000 years, we have to postulate that today’s Mayans only re-occupied a previously lost civilization, a non-human civilization.<br />
If we examine a map of the Mayan temples, we see that their locations are oriented southwest to northeast. If we draw lines connecting those temples and then re-position the Yucatan to the way it was 65 million years ago, the lines we drew now show the Mayan temples to be laid-out parallel to the southern coast in an East-West orientation. This has to be more than coincidence. A closer look shows us that the Yucatan was a level coastal plane with a sea to the south. The Mayan temples have to be more than 65 million years old.<br />
Furthermore, other archeological sites in Mexico share this same orientation. Teotihuacan, 25 miles northeast of Mexico is one example. Again, if we re-position Mexico to where it was 65 million years ago, Teotihuacan is now aligned east to west. This east to west orientation is preferable because the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. Also, since the earth wobbles, the sun would rises at a slightly different place every day and return to its original point at the beginning of a new year. The whole city lay-out acts like a giant calendar.<br />
One more thing, a launch pad in this region would aid a rocket to achieve escape velocity since it can take advantage of the earth’s rotational velocity.<br />
Although we have found evidence for a 65 million year old Mayan civilization, the world will not accept it unless it is provided with irrefutable proof. What is needed is an expedition to uncover the KT boundary and find artifacts below it.<br />
So, why not begin a “Mission to Earth” to seek out this proof. This is the only way to deal with NASA. Find the proof on Earth. We would like to assist in this quest.</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-9979868725750299812015-01-25T17:14:00.000-08:002015-01-25T17:14:22.206-08:00Mr. Black's Findings On Teotihuacan In Mexico.....Civilized Life Existed 70 million Years Ago<h2 class="entry-title">
Truth is always stranger than fiction. Maybe that is why the “experts” are so afraid of it. Just think, the truth can undue a pet scientific theory and at the same time call entire academic discipline into question. </h2>
<div class="entry-content">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEigDUkK-TJjryDOfNrY7wwuBhgzcxVNS1H411uEB_pt07p_GWrMbujf59yBzpu7BY8uSwLT0ttbSIhYYqTZwq5j5PUfW6BPGgWRHooKbX37WHqPdbbkUBrgx1Hli5aUc6yX2a03VuUx0whI/s1600/teto.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEigDUkK-TJjryDOfNrY7wwuBhgzcxVNS1H411uEB_pt07p_GWrMbujf59yBzpu7BY8uSwLT0ttbSIhYYqTZwq5j5PUfW6BPGgWRHooKbX37WHqPdbbkUBrgx1Hli5aUc6yX2a03VuUx0whI/s1600/teto.png" height="160" width="320" /></a> Egyptology has this problem. The discipline dates the Sphinx at 2500 BC in spite of the fact that geological erosion experts have said that it exhibits water erosion and must be very much older, maybe even over 800,000 years old. So, in the case of the Sphinx, geological conclusions do not matter. <br />
The same issue applies to the Mexican lost ruin of Teotihuacán. This archaeological anomaly is found 40 kilometers (25 miles) northeast of Mexico City at latitude 19° 41’ N and longitude 98° 50’ W. <br />
Current thinking believes that this site was established at 100 BC with the major monuments being built about 250 AD. Furthermore, the “experts” believe that the monuments were sacked and burned at 550 AD. See Wikipedia for a discussion of all this.<br /> Archaeological excavations of Teotihuacán can be traced to the late 17th century. It was then that Carlos de Siguenza y Gongora began digging at the Pyramid of the Sun. It wasn’t until the twentieth century that excavations began in earnest.<br />
In 1905 Leopold Batres started a major excavation and restoration of the Pyramid of the Sun. There were other excavations in 1920 and again in the 1940s and 1950s but it was not until 1960-1965 that Jorge Acosta initiated the first site wide restoration of Teotihuacán. Again, see Wikipedia. <br />
Now, let us not judge the 17th and early 20th century researchers too harshly. That is because they had no knowledge of plate tectonics or the cause of the destruction of the dinosaurs by the meteorite impact at Chicxulub Crater on the coast of the Yucatan. <br />
So, why is knowledge of plate tectonics so important? Well, it is important because the continents move and North America rotates in a counter clock wise direction. This knowledge allows us to date the site of Teotihuacán and it is very much older than 2,000 years old.<br />
How do we date Teotihuacán? We date it from its alignment. This site is aligned SW to NE at 15.5 degrees East of North. This city should be aligned east to west, facing the rising sun. So how long would it take for Mexico to rotate to this current alignment?<br />
Our research into various Mexican ruins has indicated to us that the rotation of North America occurs at a rate of 1.06 degrees per million years. If we do the calculations we come to 70.23 million years for Teotihuacán achieve its current position. This is the Cretaceous Period, the time of the dinosaurs, and our work is evidence that this city existed over 70 million years ago.</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4543953758627898320.post-27856795571876420352015-01-23T17:51:00.001-08:002015-01-23T17:51:12.401-08:00Lessons From Mars <h2 class="entry-title">
<span style="font-size: small;">Mr. Black recently shared some research explaining the absence of life on Mars. Interestingly enough, this theory may be a wake up call for all of us on Earth.</span></h2>
<div class="entry-content">
Can you believe this? An American PhD (where else?) published an article in the Journal of Cosmology on November 20, 2014 and in it he stated that an alien thermonuclear bomb attack destroyed the ancient civilization on Mars. WOW!<br />
Actually, in his paper, Dr. John Brandenburg does a good job of defending his theory and he believes that this explains the Fermi Paradox of why aliens (ET) are not visiting Earth today.<br />
Dr. Brandenburg uses NASA data of isotope distribution to defend his conclusions. He sees the similarity of the distribution of these isotopes to the result of atomic testing in the atmosphere here on Earth. Furthermore, he identifies two separate blasts, one of which was a planet killer or 10 billion megatons. Without getting into a discussion of isotopes we will make a few comments about his implications of his work.<br />
First, we must state that an explosion of 10 billion megatons seems to us to be too large to be an artificial event. We think that a meteor of loosely packed material that included both uranium and thorium would be a more likely cause of the destruction of Mars. Although the explosion would not be thermonuclear, the large amount of uranium and thorium would poison Mars because it would have been distributed throughout the planet. In any case, the destruction would still be as extensive.<br />
Second, Dr. Brandenburg offers a date of 180 million years ago as the time of the blast. In fact, the doctor states that the explosion could have occurred at an even older date. Well, if we just accept his dating then we have an extreme challenge to modern mainline science because he states that the Mars Civilization bears similarities to both the Egyptians and Mayans on Earth. <br />
Although he does not say that the civilizations on Mars directly influenced or caused the civilizations on Earth, it is very hard not to think that this is the case. Let us face facts. Given that both the Earth and Mars had civilizations of similar cultural characteristics it would seem obvious that the one on Mars which dates to 180 million years ago would have at least influenced the Earth civilizations. This tends to push the age of Earth’s Egyptian and Mayan Civilizations to 180 million years ago if not even older. This is a strong challenge to modern mainline science. Maybe we are descended from ET.<br />
In one of our posts on this blog we discussed the possibility that Mars may have been destroyed 250 million years ago. See our post “Was Mars Destroyed 250 Million Years Ago” posted in June 16, 2014. Well, it seems from a brief examination of Dr. Brandenburg’s article that we were more right than wrong. <br />
We want to thank Dr. John Brandenburg for his research and article and welcome his future work.</div>
Lenny Giardinohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08075004861452412791noreply@blogger.com0